CRM No. M 32242 of 2009 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
--
CRM No. M 32242 of 2009
Date of decision: 07, 2009
Manish Kumar ........ petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana .......Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: Mr. Surinder Dagar, Advocate
for the petitioner
Mr. Pradeep Virk, DAG, Haryana
for respondent-State
Mr. Robin Dutt, Advocate
for the complainant
-.-
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be
allowed to see the judgement?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether the judgement should be reported in
the Digest?
Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that legal notice was
issued on 18.08.2009. In the aforesaid legal notice, there was no mention
about the amount over and above Rs.1,00,000/-. Whereas, in the FIR which
was lodged on 24.10.2009, an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- has been shown. It
is further stated that in case this amount had been paid to the petitioner, the
same would have been mentioned in the legal notice.
CRM No. M 32242 of 2009 2
It is brought to the notice of the Court by the learned counsel for
the complainant that the legal notice was issued only qua the bounced
cheques and not with respect to the remaining amount for which no cheque
was issued. The matter is still at the investigating stage. The said money was
paid to the petitioner by misleading the complainant with a promise that he
shall be sent abroad. However, the petitioner embezzled the aforesaid amount
and nor sent the complainant abroad.
No ground for bail is made out.
Dismissed.
(Nirmaljit Kaur)
Judge
December 07, 2009
mohan