High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Manish Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 1 October, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Manish Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 1 October, 2010
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                       Cr.Misc. No.32988 of 2010
             MANISH YADAV S/O BIJO @ BIJENDRA YADAV
                                 Versus
                        THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                -----------

2. 01.10.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner

and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case

instituted for the offence under Sections 341,

307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms

Act.

It has been submitted that the occurrence

took place in the midst of an altercation and the

petitioner has fair antecedent.

Considering the same, let the petitioner

above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties

of the like amount each or any other surety to be

fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of

learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in

connection with Gogari P.S. Case No. 56/2010, G.P.

No. 577/10, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of

the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner

who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how
2

he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will

undertake to furnish information to the Court about

any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the

affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not

an accused in any other case and if he is he shall

not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also

state on affidavit that he will inform the court

concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other

case of similar nature after his release in the present

case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty

to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on

ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on

the given date and be present on date fixed for

charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates

and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be

liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (v) That

the petitioner will be well represented on each date if

he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail

will be liable to be cancelled.

Fahad.                            ( Anjana Prakash, J. )