IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M- 44822 of 2005
Date of Decision: October 30, 2008
Manjinder Singh
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another.
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND.
Present: Mr. Sandeep Chopra, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Ms. Manjari Nehru, DAG, Punjab.
S.D. Anand, J.
The parties (petitioner – Manjinder Singh son of Sh.
Charan Singh and also respondent No.2 – Manjeet Kaur wife of
Manjinder singh daughter of Nasib Singh) have compounded the
offence. They are identified by their respective learned counsel.
The parties to the impugned prosecution own up the compounding.
Attention of this Court is also invited to Annexure P/1, a copy of
judgment dated 22.08.2001 vide which a petition filed by the
estranged couple under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act,
was allowed.
In the light of the foregoing discussion, the plea for
compounding shall stand allowed. FIR No.142 dated 28.06.1999,
Crl. Misc. No. M-44822 of 2005 2
under Sections 498-A, 406, 506, 45 of the Indian Penal Code,
Police Station Sadar Rajpura, District Patiala, shall stand quashed.
Disposed of accordingly.
October 30, 2008 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge