High Court Karnataka High Court

Manjulamma vs K T Rameshappa on 2 March, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Manjulamma vs K T Rameshappa on 2 March, 2009
Author: B.S.Patil
Respondents» 1 & 2 are the

Residents of Mallegudda,
Near Kukuwada Temple,
Joladahal Post,

C Taluk,
Davanagere Dist.

Respondent No.3 is the

Resident of Kittadal Village, T.
Mathodu Hobli, Hosadurga *I’q.’,”—,
Chitxadurga District. ”

These Writ Pe1itions«-ate nnfleiv Articles 226.. & 227 of
the Constitution of India praying’ to >__the order dated
26.06.2008 passed. on thee-vappIica§%io11″.i.e;’* »_i;A.Nos.5 to 7 in
O.S.No.7/2004 byvthe leiaI11e.cl_:}Uud’ge_’V{Sr.I)11.), at Holalkere as
per Anne:-mre-J énéiiiethexnby dismiss: application filed
by the 1esponde:et;g_

511» £91″; preliminary hearing this
day, the m3;de;_the
L A “¢°;;;..’eR,%r:> 3 R

” net complied with the ofice objections.

time the matter is being listed for <:omply1ng'

\Axfi§h*1:_'_n.eA eiijeetions.

I§Men«:_t}1ough the matter is called twice, there is no

'ggspizesentation for the petitionexs. Hence, the writ petitions axe

é ' ' " _ * for default.

Sd/-3
Judge

PKS