High Court Karnataka High Court

Manjunath R S/O Late M Rangappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 November, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Manjunath R S/O Late M Rangappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 November, 2009
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh
IN TEE HIGI} COURT OF KARNATAKA AT
BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 391"" DAY OF NOVIa:MBER:9o9
BEFORE   

THE HONDLE MR. JUSTICE HULUVADIH;(;.RIAI§i'EsAI:;A 

CRIMINAL PETITION:~£'();6434S',:0f"2_;Q;;Qg.VV:   A

BETWEEN:

MANIUNATH R
S/O LATE M RANGAPPA

AGED 50 YEARS   '

R/A NO2528    
16TH D MAIN ROAD     

H A L, II STAGE  * "

    ...PETIT.IONER
(By S1§jT_ PRASHA:NfiI.,_:':A«flV)

éifli 

 f  STATE.,OF KARNATAKA
  "IRA/_'B'Y:ETVS STAHON HOUSE OFFICER
A ~C'E_NTR«.é\_~L._'PQLICE STATION

BANGALORE
R/BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR... RESPONDENT

(Al3y’S1V*I B BALAKRISHNA, HCGP)

WM

2
THIS CRLP IS FILED U/S438 CR.P.C BY THE

ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT

THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO

THE RETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE

ARREST IN FIR NOJ87/09 .OF.._4CEN.TR}fiIL’4

STATION, FOR THE OFFENCE Rkuk/Saab fif>.”N’V)”.,’,-:\j~%4-‘:

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION_A COMING ‘ON FOR
ORDERS THIS DV[1X”:..’:., MADE THE

FOEL,OW’INOf:; t

I) E R

.PetitiO’ITer Sougiat for grant Of anticipatory bail in

V. – eOII*–rIectiOn”wjth 187/09 of respondent police.

2.__;’ allegation. against the petitioner is that when he

V In/as discharging his duties as the Chairman Of Kempogowda

W”

Institute of Medical Sciences, he had assured to allot two
medical seats on NR} quota and collected a sum of

Rs.1,00._00,00()/- from one Bhagawantzh Singh anri.Vl_lth:at.._ he

neither made arrangement for the seats nor returned the”–a’in{)tivntL

Accordingly, the complaint came to he filped. H ” ‘ll

3. Heard.

4. According to the learned1Cou~ns’elf;~fo_r_i.t:he- petitioner the

amount is paid Se_creta-ry and’n.ot.to,fthe petitioner. He is

ready to n’-ia’E<e hi'ni's»e:l1"tauailahle "for the investigation.

5,piV'A.ccordi'ngv-.t.ithe learned Government Pleader there is

p1’im”-a._facie_lCase against the petitioner and in the event of

gi’a__nt ()fvhali’il3-j;ol’the petitioner, he is likely to avoid investigation.

6′;,Hlowever. to enable the prosecution to secure the

petitioner for the purpose of investigation, petitioner would be

considered. for grant of limited bail. Accordiaagly, petition. is

allowed. Petitioner shall surrender before the respondent-police

within 15 days and on his appearance he be ar1’ested and

released on bail on his executing a pe1’sonal—-.li3o_ijd.j’

Rs.50,000/– and a surety for the said sum to_t.he,usatis’factionof,’

the concerned police subject to the liolloswiinfg lcond.itions’:”w-.,__ ;; i

~ ii3’kn.

(i)

(ii)

rm)

tii’v)_ ”

Petitioner shallV’:rna1_<:e liimlslel.f ar/lailablue to

investigating agency and w'–he11Vwrequi"ried.lll

He shall not

V"W._ith the "prosecution
witnesses. ~ 3 "

Siiialol zafioue’ for…regu}ar bail within one month
‘ from the d.ate~.of his. arrest and release.

Th’e»._e’o-nceriie_”cl”Court to deal with the matter on

qrnerits-_ Wi_tho.ut being influenced by the grant of

an.t_i_ci’pator’y bail.

Sd/-cg
J’u.c1g:§