High Court Karnataka High Court

Manjunatha vs State By on 19 March, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Manjunatha vs State By on 19 March, 2009
Author: K.Bhakthavatsala


1Q9

from the shop of the petitioner am} ci;~iéé;,-€3:1e :?;1é§:ije

cut: a prima facit case for the the ‘A J

petitioner.

4. At this stage, it thévvfifirfiéent lpetiticner
sold illicit liquor a;1d _f§1€ same, the person
died. It is for me’ 9:0 1.–;:.r.g§a§.e in the mm.

5. in iifiaflfiwed and the Investigating
Oficer to release the petitioner on
bail in fivefit i§::£Ti%;”t1}i}_ji€{:t to fulfiiiment 0f flu: following
condimns; A A V

a ‘chat j3é’t:ij::£one;: shali execute a persenal bond for a
_ -of Rs.20,00(}/~ with a surety far like sum to the
‘_’v3aIi$féction of the investigating Officer;

fiat the pctitionm” shall appear befam the Iuvesfigating
VV Oficcr on car before 04.94.2009;

‘ ‘ flrxat the pefifioner shall appear before the Investigaiing
Gfiiccr as and when required far the purpose of

ixzvastigation and intezzogatien;
F

bnv*

iv}

31:»

CR’ L,.Pi’.N;§§A2″:??f’;:ér:’e9′

that the petitioner shaiiv-< "I1?-J3.' \§:?;Vth ', the

pmsacution witmtssesg

that the petitioner shéR is;1§:+Ve fi:1:__ E§ef0re"' V

the Triai Cour: within 3. '$.91-;+;%1 mm. «ghc diiate of his
arrest by the i:::_§r'::;figa:ii:f'i'g'VA event,
this bail (}I'd6I' 'be .__the regular bail
petition

Ex judge