Manofi Pattuk vs Narain Mahton on 12 February, 1890

Calcutta High Court
Manofi Pattuk vs Narain Mahton on 12 February, 1890
Equivalent citations: (1890) ILR 17 Cal 489
Author: Pigot
Bench: W C Petheram, Prinsep, Pigot, O’Kinealy, Ghose


JUDGMENT

Pigot, J.

1. In this case we agree with the decision come to by Mr. Justice Mitter, and Mr. Justice Macpherson, and referred to in the order of reference; and in answer to the question put to this Bench, we think that the words “amount of rent annually payable by a tenant” occurring in Section 153 of the Bengal Tenancy Act include the case of rent payable by a tenant to one of the co-sharer landlords who collects his rent separately.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *