High Court Karnataka High Court

Manohar Reddy vs State Of Karnataka By on 29 October, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Manohar Reddy vs State Of Karnataka By on 29 October, 2009
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh


.. ,……….E..’:-W mmm-mm -:~:-mm- C0135?!” U!’-‘ KARNATARA i#:ic;”I’-‘:”t:i*.>’t’j’tz””i’ 6% k’A1zN’ATAKA Hits”!-1 ‘¢i”:’i:i’i3iz”r’ oré’xKfnmi1’*AkR’ ‘<':'o"£}"E

Wm

xx $22 aigg Sfififif 8? K§R§§TkKA g??BA$§§;é£E%

3A€2§ $323 ?EE 2?" magma? @§%é§§§; 2§g§p'u

BE?$§E 2"'

THE EQ§*BEE §R.§§;::$E §§E§¥%§E_@ &&fiESH "'

aazgzmag §ETZ?§§§f¥%$4§§3f2§§§

§E§fi§§E3€
fi£fi§§fi3*RE§$Y } ._ _g_ ;

§.—»&.

fififi 3§%£*§A3g$gH_§Efi§§f
gig? §§,5§; §€§ Q Mazx R&%§
.”£fi%iRé§}L£E§¥T “*”

1 §$a§a§§ga5am§xa-

§§g§$A;§a£e;3fa ,

?Ea?$$§aL ££§$¥
4;’%a$§§=§§”E§AR§
“a ,$:§ S§R§«§A§&E§H 333$?

‘%£§E;§@.§§, §%§ & fifilfi ESEE
= g§fi§f§Efi§ ag2@§?

‘=§§§§§Efi§$§§§Eé
§%§§§L§R§~§§

?§TITZQ§¥§E.S

{kg §zi ; g §E§?§Ag £3? E

3.. E’3f§:”E’E {E3 I
§fi£*i§.§.§%rE§§E 3? §
Efifififiéfififi i 5 w §E§§%C’}§§§E§*§’E’

{Egg 3:1 3 R E? -iigiii–; ,E§E%=3§;§ §E§G§}

R?”

…… ………. W nnm1A1A:£A men count or KARNATAKA HIGH coumr or KARNATAKA Hit”.-*.”§”i””‘c’:ot1s

_–. ..w …. —- an a

fimég? yzzga §;$”43a fiEJ§F% . B§=i*:§2
&E¥G$§§E ESE wag FETEEZQRERS §a&§:§$,€§gf $§§a =F
ammfigzz sggmz fig? BE §;sa$§3;@$Tg§LAa§S,§fiE1

FEERS. 53%: mzzm. :25: Em $:?g:~?3:n §E’°’ _’–j;”:§=£vE.»’:€n
“:2: SREEE ism. a§33;’2’§.§”§-…V_ $3″ §s§:s;£g::§::}§’: ‘?za::::é%fc:s_V_ ;%:€f;+§3QR efiaamg 292233
gag, Tggigaéxz gag: fag §§fi$fi§ER&:

fig §é§i:i$$&:$”hava goagfit fa: grant af

agtigigétazy” bail in $$§§e£ti§§ withT Srima

‘-A«:%?.z>::.,~;:§»:%’%’.3ft2%A:r::§z:¢=r§ Qf Eanaawafii §¢:;:;.:g 3333:: $33

7″ aEi@§§§’éfif§n$a §u§i$ha%E$ unfiea Sactiana 42?;

31:33 ::’;”:=§.§§§¢t3i.,&zx 3% $5 :z:§$,,

2″»n$;, Eaard fihg 2aaza§§T Qfiafifiél fa: aha

}:%$§§$t:v$ ggxtigag

W.

HHS!-i COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA H56!-I COI.-I’ll!’ C3? KARNWKH. HiG§ COUR

— —- nnazsznlfllf-\l£R

3′ Eariier thg gatitiamaxfi hav@ §eéfi §§§£t§d
anticiyatazy hail aab5§§u§nti§m’§fi: ‘$nV3:h$

fieath at tag aawglainafit aha &ié§ 3£§§£7¢na

m9§th4 af the alle§#§,zimfii§an:; $§e-m¢ffamfié
unfisx Saatien 3&2 af §?¢ w§5.§fi§§§3€ A3 suah
the §@tit:angrs $£§:§&§§%Pi§é,apprah@n3ien at
azzeafi anfl.vtha;%§§:gg ig§§g %i§ m¢?ing thifi
away? figfié§§§n{ ¢§:ag%iéi§§%@ry bail. figart
Exam %h§§ §§§%» §%%i§§§3§ré axe &§§§$§$Efiifi§

axragt.vfé:,”%§a waf§anms §unisha%la undar

§e¢ti@§T-3{§}53§€§§’ af $£?$? i§zev%nti¢m af

.§£;:.*:s::.3Lti§%.::§_ ‘gm ;

“,§3 ‘§fi Vt§§ §{§%um5%amaasg ié $5 fififi thg
Lu§§titi@§éxé :%§ 5a:§®n§e:* befgzg §h§ ggaaiai
fi§fi%§i$inéé’tha avgzt afit a:tzi§uta§ agaimst
* i§§gg §§%§%i@n&E$ ifi that t&§y havé afiaauitgé

Zf»§§%,$a§ainafit amé afigthsr with gtfimsg,

W”

_. _ _ ,. ………,……… nnarl Wu.” ur mxunmm e-non COURT as KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KAiuE£%iTx”Z7»?iGH coua

E. Raging E§§&fifi :3 tfia avgzt a¢§’a:i$£bfi:éfi

Shfill &§§§az befsre tfiei§§éfii§i €§u%§ié$ %$§n
tfifi Syeaiai cfiart é§§&§ ¢§nai§§%X%§éi§ caéé
far’ gxamt afi hgii ‘%i%§$m ugwé tfiaas Exam tha
éate sf filing ¢f $a£ij§§$§£¢§fiion kg imgesig

auitabie $§nfiiti5$S;;3$€§rd

‘ inqiy; tha gatitian

is &22¢w$fi7,fi ”

Sd/4
JUDGE

a§&in$t %§eae Qfifififiififififfig’ the §$titiQfi§I3fx