High Court Kerala High Court

Manoj Anslem Rebeiro vs Candec Elizebeth Rebeiro on 5 February, 2007

Kerala High Court
Manoj Anslem Rebeiro vs Candec Elizebeth Rebeiro on 5 February, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 721 of 2007(S)


1. MANOJ ANSLEM REBEIRO,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. CANDEC ELIZEBETH REBEIRO,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM

                For Respondent  :SRI.V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.RAMACHANDRAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :05/02/2007

 O R D E R
            M. RAMACHANDRAN & S.SIRI JAGAN, JJ.

              ----------------------------------------------

                 W.P(C).NO. 721  OF 2007 - S

              ----------------------------------------------

               Dated this the 5th day of February, 2007


                          J U D G M E N T

Ramachandran, J.

By Ext.P2, the Supreme Court had directed that

the dispute of the parents would be decided by the Family

Court, Thiruvananthapuram untrammelled by any earlier

findings. On the strength of the order, the husband had

requested the Family Court that custody of the child is to

be handed over to him as visitational rights alone were

reserved in favour of the wife.

2. However, the Family Court found that there was

clarification required in the matter of visitational rights,

since the Supreme Court had not interfered with the issue

of custody while Ext.P2 order was passed. The petition was

not allowed for this reason. This order is under challenge,

now.

3. We had heard counsel for the petitioner as well

as respondents.

WP(C) NO.721 OF 2007

:-2-:

4. We do not find any error in the manner in

which the issue has been approached by the court.

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that

expeditious steps will be taken to get the order of

clarification as had been referred to in the order of the

Family Court. The husband also may move for any such

orders, in his discretion. As and when such clarifications

come, the Family Court will have to take a decision in

consonance with the orders. We cannot set any time

limit for the purpose, but record the submission of the

respondent that whatever necessary will be done, without

delay.

The writ petition is therefore closed.

M. RAMACHANDRAN

(JUDGE)

S.SIRI JAGAN

(JUDGE)

Mbs/

WP(C) NO.721 OF 2007

:-3-:

M. RAMACHANDRAN &

S. SIRI JAGAN, JJ

——————————————

W.P.(FC).NO. OF 200

——————————————

WP(C) NO.721 OF 2007

:-4-:

J U D G M E N T

DATED: -11-2006

WP(C) NO.721 OF 2007

:-5-: