High Court Kerala High Court

Manoj.K vs State Of Kerala on 10 November, 2009

Kerala High Court
Manoj.K vs State Of Kerala on 10 November, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 6139 of 2009()


1. MANOJ.K, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.KUTTAPPAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.V.DILEEP

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :10/11/2009

 O R D E R
                      K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                    ---------------------------
                    B.A. No. 6139 of 2009
               ------------------------------------
           Dated this the 10th day of November, 2009


                           O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section

438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the

accused in Crime No. 645/2009 of Sasthamcotta Police Station.

2. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under

Sections 379 and 188 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 12

read with Section 20 and 21 of the Kerala Protection of River

Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001.

3. When the Bail Application came up for hearing on

26.10.2009, the following order was passed:

“After having heard the learned counsel
for the petitioner and the learned Public
Prosecutor, I am of the view that before
disposing of the Bail Application, an
opportunity should be given to the petitioner to
appear before the investigating officer.
Accordingly, there will be a direction to the
petitioner to appear before the investigating
officer at 9 A.M. on 4th and 5th November,
2009.

Post on 10.11.2009.

B.A. No. 6139 of 2009 2

It is submitted by the learned Public
Prosecutor that the petitioner will not be
arrested until further orders in connection with
Crime No. 645/2009 of Sasthamcotta Police
Station, Kollam.

Hand over copy of this order to both
sides.”

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the

learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner has

complied with the directions contained in the order dated

26.10.2009.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I am

of the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the

petitioner. There will be a direction that in the event of the

arrest of the petitioner, the officer in charge of the police

station shall release him on bail on his executing bond for Rs.

15,000/- with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the

satisfaction of the officer concerned, subject to the following

conditions:

A) The petitioner shall report before the
investigating officer between 9 A.M and 11
A.M. on all alternate Mondays, till the final
report is filed or until further orders;

B.A. No. 6139 of 2009 3

B) The petitioner shall appear before the
investigating officer for interrogation as and
when required;

C) The petitioner shall not try to influence the
prosecution witnesses or tamper with the
evidence.

D) The petitioner shall not commit any offence or
indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail.

E) In case of breach of any of the conditions
mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be
cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated

above.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

ln