Gujarat High Court High Court

Manojbhai vs Kantubhai on 3 September, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Manojbhai vs Kantubhai on 3 September, 2010
Author: Dn Patel,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

AO/76/2008	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

APPEAL
FROM ORDER No. 76 of 2008
 

With


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 2701 of 2008
 

In
APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 76 of 2008
 

 
 
==========================================


 

MANOJBHAI
GOVINDBHAI PATEL - Appellant(s)
 

Versus
 

KANTUBHAI
RANCHHODBHAI PATEL & 4 - Respondent(s)
 

==========================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
PR THAKKAR for Appellant(s) : 1, 
MR RR VAKIL
for Respondent(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) : 2 -
5. 
==========================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE DN PATEL
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 04/03/2008 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

1. Present
Appeal From Order has been preferred against the ex parte ad interim
relief passed by the 3rd Additional Senior Civil Judge, Navsari dated
25.2.2008 below Exhibit 5 in Special Civil Suit No.10 of 2008.

2. Having
heard the learned counsel appearing for both the parties and looking
to the facts and circumstances of the case, it prima facie appears
that the learned counsel appearing for the respondent is unable to
point out whether there is a compliance of Order 39 Rule 3 of Code of
Civil Procedure or not. Thrice this Court asked the learned counsel
for the respondent about the compliance of the provisions referred to
in Order 39 Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure. However, he has no
instruction for this compliance.

3. In
view of the above facts and also looking to the averments made by the
learned counsel for the appellant on oath that though they have filed
caveat no copy of Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 5 in Special Civil Suit No.10
of 2008 has been served. The affidavit of the present appellant
(original defendant) before the trial Court is also annexed with the
memo of present appeal (Annexure L).

4. In
view of this fact, the order passed by 3rd Additional Senior Civil
Judge, Navsari dated 25.2.2008 below Exhibit 5 in Special Civil Suit
No.10 of 2008, is hereby suspended.

5. It
is stated by the learned counsel for the parties that even otherwise
further hearing of Exhibit 5 application is fixed on 7.3.2008. Thus,
the stay granted by the trial Court, shall not be made operative and
enforceable at all. The trial Court will decide Exhibit 5 application
without being influenced by the order passed by this Court. Hence,
this Appeal From Order is disposed of. Civil Application is also
disposed of.

(D.N.

PATEL, J.)

ynvyas

   

Top