High Court Kerala High Court

Manu Saju vs Tahsildar on 8 February, 2010

Kerala High Court
Manu Saju vs Tahsildar on 8 February, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 1959 of 2010(T)


1. MANU SAJU, S/O. SAJU CHACKO,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. TAHSILDAR, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK,
                       ...       Respondent

2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR.

3. PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,

4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KORATTY.

                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.HARIHARAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :08/02/2010

 O R D E R
                T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                  W.P.(C). No.1959/2010-T
                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
           Dated this the 8th day of February, 2010

                      J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has purchased various items of

properties as per document Nos. 6427/2007, 4624/2008,

6428/2007, and 3454/2007 of SRO, Chalakkudy, namely,

Exts.P1 to P4. The total extent of land is 134 ares.

According to the petitioner, the above land are dry lands

comprised of about 88 coconut trees of 45 to 60 years age

and also Mango trees aged about 30 years, Jackfruit trees

aged about 30 years, Timber trees like Vatta along with 40

Arecanut trees, Nutmug trees, Cashewnut trees etc.. The

land in question has been classified as nilam in the

village records. By invoking the provision of the Kerala

Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, the

petitioner has filed an application before the Revenue

Divisional Officer as per Ext.P5 for reclassification of

these properties as ‘garden land’.

2. The learned Government Pleader on instructions

submitted that so far the District Level Authorised

Committee has not been constituted in that area and

therefore, reports from the Principal Agricultural Officer,

Koratty as well as the Village Officer concerned will be

W.P.(C). No.1959/2010
-:2:-

required for the Revenue Divisional Officer to take an

action in the matter.

3. Therefore, the second respondent-Revenue

Divisional Officer will take action on Ext.P5 after calling

for the reports from the Principal Agricultural Officer,

Koratty and the Village Officer concerned and pass final

orders after hearing the petitioner within a period of

three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this

Judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)

ms