-1-
IN ram HIGH com? or KARRKEAKA Am EAflGALQR$} ?_
DATED THIS THE 5"*sAY OF NOVEMBER, geofi §*%L
BEFORE _»m-
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE s Aafiéz Nézsaé :7"'"
WRIT PETITION No.3725 OF 2603 :Bbgif"*w'
savanna: V ' 4
1 MRRAPPA --';.--_;,
sxmcg DECEASED BY pas '
la. SMT Gouakamajw/oimafifipéafi77«mQ
51 YEARS'H_1,fi "j.'. ="»' »
lhh MoHANPms7Q"fiAgApéA '
AGED 32JY33Rsy '
1c.sHIvfiKpMAR;,S£Q MA§A?PA
AGED 3G,YEARa_' " i
,_ ALL ARE R/Q=NQ,;59,
"-A5"*AyMA:N RQAD
:_»_RAM¢o=LAyGuT,
'.'yIJA$AMA3AR;
*8ANGALQRE}
'i_ -;2 M$N:SHAMAP2A
» 52 YEARS,
,»'RfQ ULLAL BADASI
Wf¥ESHWANTHPUR HOBLI
'BANGALORE NORTH TALUKA
R"'u_HEANGALoRE
"=~3 KRISHNAPPA,
SINCE DECEASED BY LRS
3a RATNAMMA W/O KRISHNRPPA
- 2 -
45 YERRS. R/O K R PURAM
EANGALORE ... ?ETITIQN$ES f. _
(By Srl SURESH D DESHEANDE, ADV.)
AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER V'-, A: V v_ .--
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT ';2x;:'*pHoR::z*y_
SANKEY TANK ROAD, V' . '~
BANGALORE - 560,630
2 .ADDITIONAL LAND AC¢v:Szé:om *7z._
OFFICER, BANGALORE DEvELQ2MENT*!
AUTHORITY, SAEKEE $AMK'RGAE,_ "
BANGALORE ~ §6Q.Q2Q=u _.i,...RESPONDENTS -
(By Sri Bgsayéaaq Q séééafifi, §DV.}
THIS WRIT PETiTiGNrIS'FILEB UNDER ARTICLE
226 AND 22? "OF 'THE' QQNSTITUTION OF INDIA,
vaayxuc To DIRECT THE Rgsvonnawws TO ALLGT A
SITE TQ was EETITIONER UNDER BDA {INCENTIVE
ascngma Fog VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 0? LAND) RULES
1939;«,V ,-_--_
7T$1s°&R:T§éETITI0N COMING ON FQR ORDERS
' V THIS ngy, $35 COURT PASSED THE FQLLOwING:~
O R D E R
-} T5éA petitioners contend that the lands
‘- beiéfiging to them in Sy.N0.96 measuring 1 acre
Hu 2 guntas, Sy.No.163/7 measuring 1 acre 4
guntas, Sy.No.161/3 measuring 19 guntas and
3
i
K;
.~.~ss?-‘~'””
-3-
Sy.No.l8?/5 measuring 12 guntas are situated
at Ullal village, Yeshwanthpur $b§ll}u
Bangalore Nerth Taluk, have been acqfiiréfitbfhh
the State Government for formatien er é layeut\
called Sir’ M.VishVeshwaraieh,h: llnfi=, st§g§7
Layout and that the said lande have been méde
over to the 1″‘ resgQndentD*f¢rz termatien of
the layout and for ailetnenfi ft the sits to
the general pehjiciln eecereenee}nlth law. It
is further eentehfiaefithgétggfiper the scheme
formuletefi hf the reebnnfients at the time of
acquisiticn}, petitinners are entitled for
.~_allQEnentV of *tw@_ sites. They’ have filed
lgrefiresentatihn as per Annexure-D for allotment
of the eitee in terms of the scheme. Though
{the ‘ séidv representation was filed on
V’:22}l;2Ofi8, the respondents have not considered
. the teams. Therefore, they’ have filed this
“ufirit petition for the follewing reliefs:«
(1) Issue a writ of mandamus, any
other writ order or direction,
a-:5-u
record clearly discloses that petitionersfh§vogA:
filed representation as per Annexurewnjaeokifigovi
allotment of sites in accordahfeimfiith itng ‘
incentive scheme. It is also iévifienfi» thétr7
said representation has fioabéeg confiioérofi.
Therefore, I direct thoionregponéentoi to
consider the represénfiafiififi of nnfi€XUfe’D in
accordance witn’iaw§#itnina§Aporioo of three
months frog!” of copy of
this orde:, 7{“i
4. It in botany ciarified that this order
_.shou1d§ notV bé”*un@erstood as expressing any
iopinion»onfmérits of the matter in one way or
the*oEnet;3}NoVcosts.
Sd/…
Judge