High Court Kerala High Court

Mariamma Lukose vs The District Collector on 6 January, 2010

Kerala High Court
Mariamma Lukose vs The District Collector on 6 January, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 36800 of 2009(T)


1. MARIAMMA LUKOSE, W/O.N.V.THOMAS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.A.)

3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ERNAKULAM.

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.JAJU BABU

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :06/01/2010

 O R D E R
                       ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
              --------------------------------------------------
                 W.P.(C) NO.36800 OF 2009 (T)
              --------------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 6thday of January, 2010

                           J U D G M E N T

Referring to Exts.P1 to P4, petitioner submits that she owns

3.34 ares of land in Sy. No.1066 of Ernakulam Village. According to

the petitioner, when the land acquisition proceedings were initiated,

the Land Acquisition Officer recorded the extent of land as 2.42

ares. Pointing out the above and seeking necessary rectification,

petitioner has approached the first respondent by filing Ext.P5.

Orders thereon have not been passed and therefore the writ petition

is filed.

2. If as a matter of fact, a mistake in the extent of land is

brought to the notice of the District Collector, the same should be

considered expeditiously.

3. Having regard to the pendency of Ext.P5 before the first

respondent, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first

respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5, as expeditiously

as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of

production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of this writ

WPC.No. 36800/09
:2 :

petition. It is directed that final orders shall be passed with

opportunity to the petitioner to produce necessary documents in

support of her claim.

(ANTONY DOMINIC)
JUDGE
vi/