High Court Kerala High Court

Martin vs Smt.Shyni Mary on 8 April, 2008

Kerala High Court
Martin vs Smt.Shyni Mary on 8 April, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 2184 of 2008()


1. MARTIN, 39 YEARS, S/O.GEORGE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SMT.SHYNI MARY, 32 YEARS,
                       ...       Respondent

2. SHAJI KULIYATH, KULIYATH VEEDU,

3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.SUDHISH KUMAR

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :08/04/2008

 O R D E R
                          R. BASANT, J.

           ````````````````````````````````````````````````````
                    B.A. No. 2184 OF 2008
           ````````````````````````````````````````````````````
             Dated this the 8th day of April, 2008

                             O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. Petitioner is the

husband of the 1st respondent. He apprehends arrest on the

allegation that he has committed non-bailable offences

against respondents 1 and 2. The 2nd respondent is allegedly

the paramour of the 1st respondent. They had illicit

relationship and a complaint has been filed by the petitioner

before the matrimonial court alleging adulterous behaviour by

respondents 1 and 2. That petition is pending. The petitioner

apprehends that the 3rd respondent may arrest the petitioner

on the allegation that he has committed non-bailable offences

against respondents 1 and 2.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor, after taking

instructions, submits that no crime has been registered

against the petitioner on the complaint of either the 1st

respondent or the 2nd respondent. The 1st respondent has

raised allegations against her husband, the petitioner herein,

BA.2184/08
: 2 :

in a petition filed by her. The 2nd respondent has raised

allegations of refusal to return amounts by the petitioner in

another petition filed by him. On the basis of both petitions,

no crime has been registered. Police have no intention to

register any crime or arrest the petitioner on the basis of the

said petitions. In these circumstances, the apprehension of

the petitioner is without any basis, submits the learned Public

Prosecutor. The learned Public Prosecutor undertakes that if

the petitioner were to be arrested in future on the allegation

that he has committed non-bailable offences against

respondents 1 and 2 prior to this day, prior notice shall be

given to the petitioner and prior permission of this Court shall

be taken before any such arrest is effected.

3. I take note of, hereby record and accept the

submissions/undertaking of the learned Public Prosecutor.

The apprehension of the petitioner is, in these circumstances,

found to be without any merit. This petition is accordingly

dismissed.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
aks