Mathew Mappila vs Intelligence Officer -Ii on 5 January, 2009

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 255 of 2009(E)


1. MATHEW MAPPILA, PROPRIETOR, HOTEL THILAK
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. INTELLIGENCE OFFICER -II,DEPARTMENT OF
                       ...       Respondent

2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER(APPEALS),

                For Petitioner  :SRI.ARIKKAT VIJAYAN MENON

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH

 Dated :05/01/2009

 O R D E R
                                  K.M.JOSEPH, J.
                       - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                             WP.(C) No. 255 of 2009
                       - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                     Dated this the 5th day of January, 2009

                                     JUDGMENT

Petitioner challenges Ext. P4. Ext.P4 is an interlocutory order

imposing payment of 40% of the amount as a condition for grant of stay

besides furnishing security.

2. I heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Government Pleader.

Having regard to the facts and in the interests of justice the

petitioner is called upon to pay 30% of the amount instead of 40%.

Petitioner is given two weeks time to comply with the conditions as

modified. The other conditions in Ext.P4 will stand.

(K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE)

sb