High Court Kerala High Court

Mathew vs The State Of Kerala on 13 July, 2010

Kerala High Court
Mathew vs The State Of Kerala on 13 July, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 21632 of 2010(D)


1. MATHEW, S/O. CHACKO,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. LISSAMMA MATHEW, S/O. MATHEW,

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,

3. THE TAHSILDAR,

4. THE SUB-REGISTRAR,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.ANANTHAKRISHNAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :13/07/2010

 O R D E R
                         S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
                    ------------------------------
                    W.P.(C) No.21632 OF 2010
                    -------------------------------
              Dated this the 13th day of July, 2010

                         J U D G M E N T

The petitioners are the owners of a property. The

petitioners want to sell the same. But the petitioners are

confronted with the difficulty that in the fair value register

prepared by the fourth respondent, this particular property is

shown as Government land. The fact that the same is a mistake

has already been certified by the Tahsildar by Ext.P4. But even

thereafter, no steps are being taken to correct the fair value

register, is the grievance of the petitioners in this writ petition.

2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also.

The petitioners have already submitted Exts.P3 and P5 before the

second respondent. In the above circumstances, in view of

Ext.P4, the second respondent is bound to take appropriate steps

on Exts.P3 and P5.

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction

to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P3

W.P.(c)No.21632/10 2

and P5 taking into account Ext.P4 also as expeditiously as

possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the

date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an

opportunity of being heard to the petitioners.

S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

acd

W.P.(c)No.21632/10 3