IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.32608 of 2010
MD.ARMAN, son of Md. Kalam
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
4/- 03.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned
P.P. for the State.
Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Pirbahore P.S.
Case No. 108 of 2010, registered under Sections 399, 402 of I.P.C. and
25 (1-B)a, 26/35 of Arms Act.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that in self-statement of the informant no date of preparation of
the aforesaid self-statement has been given and the seizure list is said to
be prepared on 08.04.2010, whereas memo of arrest contains the date of
arrest as 09.04.2010. He further submits that as a matter of fact, neither
petitioner was caught at the spot nor anything was recovered from his
conscious possession.
Although, the report of Sr. Superintendent of Police, Patna
dated 23.10.2010 reveals that petitioner carries criminal antecedents of
four cases, considering the above stated discrepancies, I think it proper
to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, petitioner,
namely, Md. Arman, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail
bonds of Rs. 10,000/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VII, Patna, in
connection with Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 108 of 2010 ( Sessions Trial
No. 117 of 2010).
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)
Ashwini/-