High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Md.Arsad Khan @ Chhotu vs State Of Bihar on 24 September, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Md.Arsad Khan @ Chhotu vs State Of Bihar on 24 September, 2010
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Cr.Misc. No.29187 of 2010
                  MD. ARSAD KHAN @ CHHOTU, SON OF SARWAR ALAM
                                           Versus
                                    STATE OF BIHAR
                                         -----------

3. 24.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under Sections 366A and 120B of the Indian Penal

Code.

It has been submitted that from the statement of the

alleged victim recorded under Section 164 Cr. P.C. it appears to

be a case of consent between the two adults.

In view of such, let the petitioner above named, be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other

surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in Katihar (Town) P.S. Case

No. 129 of 2010 (G.R. No. 953 of 2010) subject to the following

conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of

the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to

how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to

furnish information to the court about any change in address of

the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the

petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he

shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the bailor shall also state

on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the
2

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after

his release in the present case and thereafter the court below

will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail

on the ground of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given

date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to

do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his

bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That

the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he

fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to

be cancelled.

( Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali