High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Md. Ezazul Haque Khan vs The State Of Bihar on 26 August, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Md. Ezazul Haque Khan vs The State Of Bihar on 26 August, 2011
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Cr.Misc. No.17708 of 2011

           Pato Khan, Son of Md. Samim Khan.
           Resident of Village Pithouri, P.S. Akbarpur, District Nawada.
                                                                              ---------- Petitioner
                                           Versus
           The State Of Bihar.
                                                                           -------- Opposite Party
                                           With

                                 Cr.Misc. No.16717 of 2011

           Md. Ezazul Haque Khan, Son of Ezazul Khan.
           Resident of Village Pithouri, P.S. Akbarpur, District Nawada.
                                                                              ---------- Petitioner
                                           Versus
           The State Of Bihar.
                                                                           -------- Opposite Party
                                          -----------

For the Petitioner :- Mr. Prabhakar Singh, Advocate.
For the State :- Mr. Mritunjay Kr. Nirala, Additional Public Prosecutor.

(In Cr. Misc. No. 16717 of 2011)

———-

03/- 26/08/2011 Since both these applications arising out of one common

case are taken up together and being disposed of by this composite

order.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon

copy of the case diary.

Petitioner of both the applications apprehend their arrest,

in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 20 of 2011 for the

offences punishable under Sections 452, 341, 323, 328, 307/34 and

302 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Nawada.

After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners

seeks permission to withdraw both the applications with a liberty to
2

surrender before the court below within a fortnight for a prayer of

regular bail, which shall be considered on its own merit, without being

prejudiced of instant withdrawal.

Permission is granted.

Accordingly, both the applications stands disposed of as

withdrawn.

Praveen/-                            ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)