High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Md. Irshad @ Hakru And Anr. vs The State Of Bihar on 5 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Md. Irshad @ Hakru And Anr. vs The State Of Bihar on 5 September, 2011
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Criminal Miscellaneous No.19469 of 2011

                1.Md. Irshad @ Hakru, Son of Md. Moheed, Resident of Village Manzil
                Mobarak, P.S. Kalyanpur, District Samastipur.
                2.Md. Sitarey, Son of Md. Abulais, Resident of Village Shahpur Baghauni
                Tola, Fazilpur, P.S. Waini, District Samastipur.
                                                                       ---------- Petitioners
                                                    Versus
                The State Of Bihar.
                                                                  -------- Opposite Party
                                                -----------------

03/- 05.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon

copy of the case diary.

The two petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection

with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 376,

448, 341, 323, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, are named

accused in this case with allegation of committed and continued gang

rape upon the informant resulting into her pregnancy, which could be

disclosed to her in laws, soon after the marriage, consequently

matrimonial relationship was dissolved. They further, in order to

disappear the pregnancy assaulted the informant.

Submission is that due to dispute relating to land etc.,

petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and earlier the

victim disclosed the name of culprit as one Md. Naushad in a

Panchayati, but has changed the stand. Further, submission is that

petitioners are ready for D.N.A. test. Learned Additional Public

Prosecutor, who is armed with case diary, pointed out that earlier

statements of the victim stating the name of the petitioners and the

person instrumental in her pregnancy.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the

two above named petitioners appears not entitled for the relief sought.

Hence, their prayer for anticipatory bail, in connection with Tajpur

(Waini) P.S. Case No. 10 of 2011, pending in the court of Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, is hereby rejected.

Praveen/                           ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)