Md.Jahangir vs State Of Bihar on 19 August, 2010

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

                              Cr.Misc. No.21493 of 2010

                    MD.JAHANGIR S/O MD. KAYUM, R/O AMIRABAD, P.S.
                    MANIHARI, DISTRICT-KATIHAR.
                                             --PETITIONER

                                            Versus

                    THE STATE OF BIHAR               --OPP.PARTY

                    For the Petitioner        : M/s Bhola Prasad &
                                                    Sanjeev Kr.Singh

                    For Opp.Party no.2        : M/s P.K. Jaipuriyar &
                                                    Anshuman Jaipuriyar

                    For the State             : Mr. Amarendra Prasad

5   19.08.2010

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel

for opposite party no.2.

The petitioner is named accused in this case,

being husband of the complainant. On behalf of the petitioner

another criminal case has also been filed besides one

Matrimonial case seeking dissolution of marriage. The

petitioner carries allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc.

However, considering the offer made on behalf of the

petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.500/- per month by way of ad-

interim maintenance subject to order of the competent court,

dealing with Matrimonial case, on the event of depositing

Rs.1,000/- in Family Court, Katihar, in Matrimonial Case
2

no.309 of 2009 and undertaking to continue such payment of

Rs.500/- per month without fail, in the event of his arrest or

surrender within four weeks from today with supporting

material to show compliance of the order, the petitioner is

directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bonds of

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the

like amount each to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional

Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in Complaint Case no. 2461 of

2009, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of

the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that

the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date

before both the courts at least for one year or till disposal of

the case whichever is earlier. If the petitioner fails to remain

present in both the Courts on two consecutive dates without

any reasonable explanation or on failure of payment of even

one single installment the privilege granted shall be deemed

to be cancelled.

(Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

AAhmad