High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Md.Kafil vs State Of Bihar on 25 October, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Md.Kafil vs State Of Bihar on 25 October, 2010
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Cr.Misc. No.24166 of 2010
                            MD.KAFIL, SON OF PHOOL HASAN
                                           Versus
                                    STATE OF BIHAR
                                         -----------

3. 25.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under Sections 366(A), 120(B) and 34 of the Indian

Penal Code.

It has been submitted that there is some material to

suggest that in fact, it was a case of consent between the

parties.

Considering the same, let the petitioner above

named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to

the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in

Katra P.S. Case No. 215 of 2009 subject to the following

conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of

the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to

how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to

furnish information to the court about any change in address of

the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the

petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he

shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the bailor shall also state

on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the
2

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after

his release in the present case and thereafter the court below

will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail

on the ground of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given

date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to

do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his

bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That

the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he

fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to

be cancelled.

In case the petitioner continues to threaten the

prosecution witnesses, immediately step shall be taken to hold

an enquiry in the matter.

( Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali