IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.28729 of 2009
MD.MERAJ ALAM @ MAIRAJ ALAM
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
7 6.4.2011 Both the husband and wife appeared in Chambers and
had undertaken to live together. The order dated 9.11.2009 indicates
that one daughter and one son were living with the petitioner at
Udaipur while two younger boys were living with the wife at the
time when the petitioner was granted provisional bail. By order of
this Court, the petitioner went to the house of the wife to pick up the
children and thereafter they proceeded to Udaipur to lead their
conjugal life. On 23.3.2010, the petitioner (husband) and the wife
were present in Chambers. At that time, the only grievance of the
wife was that her husband did not allow her to meet with her parents.
The parties, after the matter was concluded, left the Court together.
In between something went wrong and it has been alleged that the
petitioner did not allow his wife to accompany him. On the other
hand, the petitioner claims that he was assaulted by the brother of his
wife. Today the petitioner (husband) and the wife are present in
Chambers. Since two of the children were to be in the petitioner’s
custody by virtue of an order of this Court, it would be incumbent on
the petitioner to produce the children in Chambers who will be
handed over to the mother. The other two children would be at
liberty to live with either of the parents.
List this case in Chambers at 4:00 p.m. on 11.4.2011.
Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)