High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Md. Nazim Sah & Anr. vs The State Of Bihar on 21 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Md. Nazim Sah & Anr. vs The State Of Bihar on 21 September, 2011
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                        Criminal Miscellaneous No.31119 of 2011
                        1. Md. Nazim Sah, S/o Late Muslim Sah.
                       2. Md. Hasmat Sah, S/o Late Muslim Sah.
                                          Versus
                                   The State of Bihar
                                    --------------------

02. 21.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

State.

The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for

the offences under Sections 448, 341, 323, 324, 307,

504/34 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering that there is counter-version of the

occurrence and the assault took place in the midst of an

altercation, let the petitioners, above named be released

on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five

Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each

or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the

satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in

connection with Kaluahi P.S. Case No. 71 of 2011 subject

to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will

be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an

affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the

petitioners and the other bailor shall be the brother of the

petitioners namely Md. Izarat Sah. The bailor will also

undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in

the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall

clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any
2

other case and if they are they shall not be released on

bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that

he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are

implicated in any other case of similar nature after their

release in the present case and thereafter the court below

will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation

of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioners

will give an undertaking that they will receive the police

papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for

charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and

delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to

be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the petitioners

will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do

so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be

cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-