Md.Rehan & Anr vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 20 September, 2011

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2754 of 2011
                 ======================================================
                 1. Md.Rehan , son of Late Md. Gufran
                 2. Md. Hasnan, son of late Hassan Imam, Both resident of Challu Mohalla-
                    Bihar Sharif, P.S. Biharsharif, District-Nalanda
                                                                          .... .... Petitioners
                                                    Versus
                 1. The State of Bihar
                 2. The Commissioner cum Secretary, Human Resources Development
                    Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
                 3. The Commissioner Cum Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar,
                    Patna
                 4. The Secretary, Primary and Adult Education, Bihar, Patna
                 5. The Director, Primary and Adult Education, Bihar, Patna
                 6. The District Superintendent of Education, Biharsharif, District-Nalanda
                 7. The Deputy Development Commissioner Cum Chairman, District-
                    Nalanda, Biharsharif
                 8. The District Treasury Officer, Biharsharif, District-Nalanda
                 9. The District Accounts Officer, Biharsharif, District-Nalanda
                                                                         .... .... Respondents
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioners      : Mr. Mithlesh Mowar
                 For the Respondents       : Mr. Kumar Sachin GP-24
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR
                 DATTA

                 ORAL ORDER

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA)

2 20-09-2011 The petitioners had come to this Court for

quashing the wrong fixation of pay and fixation of the same

in accordance with law and rules on the point.

In the counter affidavit it is stated that the pay

fixation of the petitioners has been corrected. Learned

counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance of the

petitioners stands redressed.

In the above circumstances, the writ application is
2

dismissed as infructuous.

S.Pandey/-                    (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)