High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Md. Salimuddin &Amp; Anr. vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors. on 7 March, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Md. Salimuddin &Amp; Anr. vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors. on 7 March, 2011
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                         MJC No.4098 of 2009
                     1. MD. SALIMUDDIN       S/O LATE NASEERUDDIN R/O MOH-
                     KHALILPURA, P.S- DANAPUR, DISTT- PATNA
                     2. SHYAM NANDAN PRASAD GUPTA S/O LATE CHHATHU SAH
                     R/O VILL- DHIKRA, P.S- PHULWARISHARIF, DISTT- PATNA
                                       Versus
                     1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
                     2. SHRI VIVEK KUMR SINGH FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO
                     THE PETITIONER, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT
                     OF ART, CULTURE AND YOUTH, BIHAR, PATNA
                     3. SHRI MAHA SHANKAR MISHRA, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN
                     TO THE PETITIONER THE DEPUTY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT
                     OF ART, CULTURE AND YOUTH, BIHAR, PATNA
                     4. SHRI MAHA SHANKAR MISHRA, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN
                     TO THE PETITIONER, THE INCHARGE DIECTOR, DIRECTORATE
                     OF ARCHEOLOGY, BIHAR, PATNA
                                                -----------

03. 07.03.2011 In compliance of the orders of this Court dated 6.8.2009,

Annexure-1 the Principal Secretary, Art Culture and Youth, Bihar,

Patna has passed order no.14 dated 3.3.2011, Annexure-A to the show

cause, whereunder claim of the petitioner for regularization has been

rejected on the ground that he failed to complete 240 days every year

in the preceding five years from the cut off date i.e. 11.12.1990 as

provided in paragraph 3(i) of circular letter dated 16.3.2006. Counsel

for the petitioner, however submits that no such requirement is

provided in paragraph-3(i) of circular letter dated 16.3.2006.

Aforesaid aspect of the matter can be better appreciated

when petitioner will challenge order dated 3.3.2011, Annexure-A.

This contempt application is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to

the petitioner to challenge order dated 3.3.2011 by filing another writ

petition.

(V.N. Sinha, J.)
Rajesh/
-2-