High Court Karnataka High Court

Milan Packaging vs Government Of Karnataka By The … on 19 February, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Milan Packaging vs Government Of Karnataka By The … on 19 February, 2009
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) And K.L.Manjunath


..;.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARKATAKA AT BANGALORE

mmso ‘nus ‘me 19*” DAY or FEBRUARY moo [_

PRESENT

‘mm aownm am. pm. DIHAKARAN. camp Jusffit’:-E’ ;; 1._i f

AND

WRIT APPEAL Ne.1291A m=A;:ao

BETWEEN:

MILAN PACKAGING”

A PROPRIETORSHSP c:__ ” A ._
HAVING yrs RiEcxs1TE_RE13,_0m?_1<3E

AT No.7A5, 1«.f:1A1:)B'~ " , M
KADUGODI IN¥?Us*:"¥21AL-'i;aRE}A"-, ~ '

NEAR MALAX iNDIA LlMl'i'ED "

BANGALORE 5601367, " % 1 =
REPRESEN'I'E_D HEREINV BY FPS
PRQVPRIETQR SE?! A.S.£V'ARAYAN

..APPELLAN'I'

(BY M[1s'.v:{_1NG:' ADVOCATE)

%2i\'.§if.3;..:.

. 3~.,. GC:VERN’zvzE;’refr 01:’ KARNATAKA

, ‘; figs?’ ‘IE :1 PRIECIPAL SECRETARY
coiwmmca 83 INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT

._ NLS.’ABUZLDING, VIDHANA VEEDHI
% _§5A’NG.ALORE 550 001.

‘A .10

. 1m,ér§ATAKA :N1:>Us’rRIAL AREAS
~m:vELoPMENT BOARD
1413, 22% FLOOR, R.P.B’UILI3ING

.<*"'

liiidexz Yeél No

3. In a. connected appeal, we have
judment of the learned single Judge ho1dj1_;1g’vvl”_tl*1e’ ,

appellant has to avail the statutory

the Act. Therefore, we do 1191; see an§,{“en9or_ cenimittedg by the

ieamed single Judge in rejectiitg _

4. In the However,
liberty is gaxatedi tp appeal before the
competent weeks from the date of

receipt of a C()A’p}yf (‘)f if such an appeal is filed,

the same “by the appellate authority on
mezritte:’at1ti dance law.
Sc1/ —

Chiei justice

Sal-

Iudqe

/”

E 2′

la