High Court Karnataka High Court

Minor Sudhir vs Smt Rathnavathi S Shetty W/O S … on 18 November, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Minor Sudhir vs Smt Rathnavathi S Shetty W/O S … on 18 November, 2008
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh
IN ':'1»§:: HIGH coma"? or: KARNA'I'AI<A AT HANGAI;c;:Rg:.' ~  _

Dated this the 18"' day of Nevember ,  ' "   5' 

Before

'IHl:' HON-'_BI.E MR JHSTYCE Htktg. o*z:4_9§3'  ::; .'m%4.3z£s;;%.___  ; T 7

Between:

Sudlfir (minor), 14 yrs .  
Rep. Eay father Saqfeeva Devaciiga! _ '_
Rfo Patelmaznane, Ampmu Viliagfi A
Kundapura Tq, Udupiflistxict   _  V

(By Sri Pavan Chg;§cir$;;1sh§::y;:'--.A&.;.} 

Ami'

I Stfit    yfrs--  V

W350 S    ~-
Rfo I'a1e13ra:I;-£16',  flfiilage
Kundéptgra Tq, Udupi Disifict

_ 2 ,, ._;:i£;.m3 India Insiiafincé Co Ltd

~  Bysfits Branch 
V g 3 Kunaia;31;ra,._I{unciapura Tq
- T "1}d11pf{?ist;fic:.

(33: gm Adv.)

Misceilanemss FirgAp;ré::£_ 114%)' 2a:96T.(2i4?}:5;_,  .

Appeliant

Respondents

Tizis. §<"irst Appeal is filed under S.i73(1) of the Mater Vehicles Act

to set aside fllfi: judgment and award datad i3.9.2%6 in MVC
j 3.83-!.20{¥44 by the Addt MACE Kundapura.

This First Appeai coming on. fear Hearing this day, the Court

” hééfivered the foilowing:

J {§DG:’5{l:’NT

T}1is appeal is by the claimant being net satisfied with_ V.

passeé by the Addl. MACT, Kandapur in we 3s5:’2o04 on “*£*i.¢'”_f H

shim petition is fiieti seeking cmnyansation of -RS’ éi,~22,SQfif- 2 ‘ :7

On 21.1.2994 arcund 9.15 3.111. near Gaizdizi :::::.:3.;5_, Kundagiu ;%13.i:~;_:

claimant was standing en the westcm sidé;–..§)f thé ‘naiitmai hi§g}i&§v’a§; ,3 *

trax bearing No. KA 20 M 3713 .p”du;§i’ ‘tsixiafds Kundapur,
daahed :0 the claimant in a :.«;gi_i’j%«1mdf_}~;eg;agei2iz_’:;i§nn¢r due to which he
sustained gievous énjmfies. Thq piaim jvvtczi’ be filed seeking

compensaticwii statiiég’i§;at_;hi:. ixisgsred with the 2” respondent. The
petition W3S”‘2″§>SlSf§’«€i.’ having faised fear issues for

conside:ra§i.rm, haV*ifigViieid.ihat .£l1eié.<.;ciden£ was éue to the negligence en the

xfzart sf {él(i;EifiV€f c~:§t}1c awaréed 3 sum sf Rs.28,05{)z'~. Being not

satiisficii " with ..;é31j1e, ciaimant is before this Caurt seeking for

enhanwriiént.

Hearxiihe counsei representing the parties.

A ” claiinzmt is said to have sufiisred injury and as per the wound

them is as fraeture of the right hummus and blunt injury an the

…iéV£0mach. The dado: who treated the injured PW 3 has also been examined.

4%”

of petition {iii deposit. The responders: insurer shali deposit the_sém§:+.’u

titres: months. App-e:a§ is aflewed én part accordingly.