High Court Karnataka High Court

Miss Lindsay Smith D/O Vernon … vs Beerappa Chennappa Hesanur S/O … on 21 January, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Miss Lindsay Smith D/O Vernon … vs Beerappa Chennappa Hesanur S/O … on 21 January, 2009
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh
I

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT
BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 215" DAY 01? JANUARY 2009

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HULUvAé§i.{;§RAMEsH

MISCELI ____.AM:0Us 1«"11;_.§-:'m%\Pfi_;*_§:z4.I,  & L   n 

BETWEEN: A    

Miss Lindsay Smith,

Aged about 20 yea2'$,'~~._ --- _4 V 
D/0 Sri.Vernon Smifhg.    V'
Residing atNo.2l,    
Vishweshwaifiifihmigéfg' - .'  - 
Arabic Ccjlle§;c'P'osi;'      

       % ...APPELLANT

(By s:;.:§;:§ri§ima.  ;ma~s,ri.s.<3uru Gopinath, Advs.)

AND:  A

 

Vi.    Hesanur,
3 Réssiding at O' Rajappa,

V   Street, Hennur Cross,

. mlyafivflagar Post,

 ' vv.Ba;§g3:iam--560(}43.

A  ..__'L'J'niL1A:{:'c1ATIndia Insurance Co. Ltd,

*~ Vlifigional Office, No.28,
Shankar Nazayana Building, M.G.Road,

Bangalore-560001 .
Represented by its Manager. ...RESPONDENTS

W

(By Sri.Y.P.Venkatapathi, Adv- fer R-2)
*1?

This M.F.A. is filed under Section
against the judgment and award dated 13.7.05′ in .MV»C

No.l36-4/O4 on the file of V Atidl, »Mem_’o”e1″”MA.C’T,v”Mayoiia.]I”
Unit, Bangalore (SCCH-20), partly aiiewi._ng’the ‘e.iai1i1’ipetitien___

for compensation and seeking e1i’hanie_ement’ ‘e_Ci1i1pc’9t_i3§itiv€jn.

This M.F.A. coming the Ceurt
delivered the feI10Wi2″3I- ‘

1’ seeking for enhancement
award pasfl by the Add}.

Judge No-23, Bangalore in MVC

Ea. ;%354;e:1, kt ~

i 5.7.9.2 around 4.30 p.m. near Byappanahafli road

crossing when the claimant was riding a moped

€Ne.KA03 EA 7403, the driver ef the lorry bearing

i it 07 X 9345 came in a rash and negligent manner and

it iiashed to fine hind portion of the moped due to the impact, the

claimant sustained injuries. She was treated at Chinmaya

Xv

3
Mission Hospital. Accordingiy, the claim petition was filed.
The matter was contested by the Insurance company since the

owner remained expartc. Based on the pIeacii.§:g”st’i’}.i4’¢fs*.s:’.I”‘:ibnnal

having raised three issues for ?ié:!.d

that the accident was due to tisasufié.-§_gEigvc§z1_cc”c:~i.§_.: éf tlég

driver of the lorry in qu.esfion .*– A §–~Iavingv iieid’; &.é1ssi’d.ed
Rs.20,000/- with 3% inteasésvtts’ Beisag’-.r:§ét’V’:sa§sfied with the
same, the appellant _

nlaimant has sustained fracture ofzm,

43′ *5?’ Bones of right foot. Operaiicn was

fixation has been done. Towards pain

‘ ” .. the Tribunal has awarded Rs.l0,000i-, Rs.84(}0f-

.’ A “V towards medical expenses, Rs.600f’-» towards

‘ncsxuésiiment, Rs.5()0f- towards attendant’ charges and

V’ x jfionvcyance and Rs.10,000i— has been awarded towards loss of

W

Rs.25,00(}f- awarded befurt: this Court shall carry interfészt at 6%
from the date of petitien till deposit. ‘ ‘V