High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Mithlesh Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 10 August, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Mithlesh Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 10 August, 2011
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Cr. Misc. No.19832 of 2011
                         Mithlesh Yadav son of Rajendra Yadav
                                        Versus
                                  The State Of Bihar
                                       -----------

4/ 10.08.2011 Supplementary affidavit on behalf of the petitioner is

being filed. Let it be kept with the record.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under sections 302 and other allied sections of the Indian

Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

It has been submitted that two groups of villagers

clashed between themselves on the day of Holi in which transaction

later on firing was resorted to by the accused persons in which

accidentally the deceased, who was crossing by, was hit. Submission

is, therefore, that in the facts of the case no offence under section

302 Indian Penal Code would be made out.

Considering the same as also that the petitioner is not

accused in any other case of similar nature, let the petitioner, above

named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-

(five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any

other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Belaganj P.S.

Case No. 29 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the

bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an

affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner.

The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about
2

any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the bailors shall

also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his

release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at

liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the

ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking

that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be

present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given

dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv) That the petitioner will be

well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two

consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

JA/-                                            (Anjana Prakash,J.)