IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA
CIRCUET BENCH AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 24¢ DAY OF' APRIL 2009 j
BEFORE
THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE AJIT J.C':'{;}1"€.~.3:i?§.l.: «
wrm' PETITION NO.626'f6 ;1§2oo9g{3;y;-":20£;I,C'P§)" X J. [ 'T
BETWEEN:
(I3s"i::R;
MITRA KREZEDA AND sANs1<zTR1I%:A..V:.
SAMSTHE, PP NQ342/1,_'
PLO'? No.65 . '
HUNGUND,,'fl__ '.'ag."
R/P3Y,1*r--s. PRES1D'E:_NT,"--..
MAHANTESHT' s1DDAL1NGA'm9A PA-RUTI-II,
AGED 37 ¥.1::;aRs',='f~.._ * ' '
OCC: CC3NTRAC'{'Of€V,__"~._ "
R/G HUNGUND, DESTLABAVGAALKOT
PETITIONER
._::S§-!V1VAII»aANA SOUBHA,
_ _ _ " --.8ANGALORE 560 00:
:2: THE QEPUTY COMMISSIQNER
T 0? 2>oLIcE:,
BAGALKGF DISTRECT,
BAGALKOT.
: 2 :
4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF' POLICE,
BAGALKCYI' DIVISION,
BAGALKOT.
5. 'THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
HUNGUND, DIST. BAGALKCYY.
6. THE POLICE SUB INSPECTOR
(CRIME BRANCH) HUNGUND, 1
TQ. HUNGUND, DIST. BAGALKOTLV
(BY SR1. R.K. HA'I'1'I,HCGP} __ 1
was PETITION IS 911.313 _ARTt'cL..ES 226 AND 22?
or THE coNs"r:TUTIoi$:'~{}rr {axiom ~-§?;%AY1:$1G TOHDAIRECT THE
RESPC$NDENTC'§'.LI'Ci2< NQ%}"~TfO Izxzslér THE PETITONER SOCIETY
TO OB:T£xIf¢4'_LICEféVC'Ei.FO'E§""i'§{{§ PLAY OF CHESS, CAROM, [)AR"I',
WALL c:0'_IN V .-- '$Utx COLOUR GAMES, RUMMY
BIL1,1A_.RDs/'SNQKER m:;gL THE INDOOR GAMES BEING RUN
r4Aiv1a.__..m»:D STYLE OF' MITRA KREEDS AND
,_ 1'SA.NSI{vf§ITIK'A"SANSTHE I-IUNGUND, No.19? 342/1 PLOT No.66
:¥~:1;_;1~«:<3r,:j1x=.::»," E:T§};..a*.R UNDER THE KARNATAKA POLICE ACT OR
UNDER ' "i*jr3;ET* PROVISIONS 0:? THE LICENSING AND
cc)'r=me:::f-:;L:rsic3 OF' PLACE OF' PUBLIC AMUSEMENT ORDER
19?o ARE: ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR' PRELIMINARY HEARING,
}:"HES DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
... .
O R' D E R
Mr. R K Hatti, learned is;
directed to take notice for respondentiV_i\ios;1v 6.: V'
2. Even though mm-.r is Iieted for
preliminary hearing, taken up for
“”” is Association registered
under ” Registration Act, 1960.
The 5 case of petitioner—Assoeiation is that it is
. i sports and indoor games such as
Carrem, and such other games for
the”‘4–.be§iefii4:”” of its members. It is the case of the
H .Ve,.i’I3’A’~’«’fitione1:’ that the respondents are insisting that the
petitioner Should obtain licence under the provisions of
VT ” ‘”Ke3:’nataka Police Act and also under the provisions of”
/
Z
:j+:
the Licensing and Controlling of Plaeeiiwof
Amusement Order, 1970.
4. Identiwl quest} z haee. ‘ ‘ Vby’ L’
this Court in w.1=. Noo i$e251L%2oo5: To ee¢ided on
27.01.2006 holding’ under the IPo]ice
Act is not reqoireo t9-‘ftiihiglg. eecreation club
of the need not obtain
any activities for the
beI1ei’i:t.._’of. Rfiofisequently, petition stands
allowed. A ‘ V V’ é
Tfie.._respondents shall not insist that the
obtain the necessaxy license for the
,_-,aJ”‘~–
1 But however, that shalléinciude the
‘game, video game and electronic coin games. The
reéépfindents also shall monitor the activities of :11}?
” V Association. /
2/V/)
.5.
.’,,v.
6. Mr. R K Haiti is permitted to
appearance within four weeks.
kmv