fundamental right guaranteed under the constitution of India in the interest of justice and equity. This Writ Petition coming on for prelirninary hearing this day, the Court made the fo13owing;__'* . ORDER
Petitioner school is before’ this a
direction to the respondent toss’-.p’errnit
education in English mediurri”»for 5 in
primary education. petitioner,
as could be seen writ petition,
that the school to the
Deputy flilnstructions (South),
re is is 2 has been rejected refusing
permissions’ to “–éugiijsicgation in english medium,
though _a specific ‘direction was given by this Court as
passed dated 8th September 2008 passed
copy of which is produced at
AnneXu.re–‘Af
As can be seen, this Court, while disposing of
is the writ petition observed in paragraph-3 as under:
‘V
Southvviilfiiistrict has issued an endorsement
informing the petitioner that the
Ki”-__V”‘*itnpart-ciducation in english medium for standards 1 to
if cannot be granted as the matter is pending before the
….fifpex Court and that once the case is decided by the
“3. A full Bench of this Court in Associated
Managements of Primary 8; Secondary
Schools in Karnataka Vs. The State
Karnataka by its Secretary, Department’:V:offuf:V”‘AV
Education and Others reported in it if
KAR 2895 has struck doiwfnpg the’.”o’ffeflnding’–.V
clauses in the aforesaid
Therefore, challenge, tom if
government order not sur\iriye”~~.Tfo’r
consideration. owevefl -1_ibe.rty . «re_seriired
to the petitioneV1’As_”to_ nxialgc application
seeking grant of English
Medium 4Sch.ooli;’forg the year 2009-
2019: If ..app’1ic,ationHV is filed, the
respon,d’e1i;t_auth’ority* directed to consider
._San?1e.in» iiaccordance with law and in the
light of the decision.”
H0W_.’3Ver, order, the Deputy Director,
reg-y1est.~~made by the school seeking permission to