Mohammadli vs Union Of India on 14 August, 2009

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 22714 of 2009(H)


1. MOHAMMADLI,S/O.ISMAIL RAWTHER,KARIPPALI,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SMT.NOORJAHAN,W/O.MOHAMMADALI,KARIPPALI,

                        Vs



1. UNION OF INDIA,REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE

3. NABARD,PONNIAM ROAD,P.B.NO.5613.STATUE,

4. THE TATTAMANGALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE

5. THE GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL OFFICER,

6. THE PALAKKAD DSTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK

                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.EASWARAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :14/08/2009

 O R D E R
                       ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                     ================
                W.P.(C) NO. 22714 OF 2009 (H)
                =====================

           Dated this the 14th day of August, 2009

                          J U D G M E N T

Petitioners are defaulters to the 4th respondent Co-operative

Bank. Awards were passed against the petitioners in February,

2006 and recovery proceedings were initiated, which have

already been challenged by the petitioners by filing WP(C)

No.24940/07 and 25024/07 and these writ petitions are pending.

It is stated that in the meanwhile, on the introduction of Ext.P1,

the Agricultural Debt Waiver and Debt Relief Scheme, 2008, they

submitted Exts.P2 and P3 applications for the benefit of the same.

Referring to Ext.P4, it is stated that orders have not been passed

on the applications and that these applications are pending

before the 5th respondent, the Grievance Redressal Officer. In this

writ petition, what they seek is essentially a direction to the 5th

respondent to pass final orders on Exts.P2 and P3 in the light of

Ext.P1.

2. I heard the counsel appearing for the 4th respondent

also.

Having regard to the limited nature of the relief that is

WPC 22714/09
:2 :

sought for, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 5th

respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P2 and P3

applications made by the petitioners, if these applications are still

pending. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible and at

any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment

along with a copy of this writ petition.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp