High Court Karnataka High Court

Mohammed Ajaj vs The Divisional Manager on 1 September, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Mohammed Ajaj vs The Divisional Manager on 1 September, 2010
Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda
E'? TIE EHQH QGUEET SF KARHATAKA AT BA1'3G2°s_LORE

QATEB THIS '1?$ Q13'? QR? C31? SEFIEEEER, 203.6.

BEFQ%

'I?-{E xasfim nm.JUs*rzcE REREEHIVASE cmzmaijf    "

B      

 

zacsmmfimmm
an). A1=m:JLKAnm

mEDABom3smAm    
RIAT No. 2213, E-IUH8EMAR1%...aBI.?S em)?" --«  
aamangqg %     

       

. = z.- 

 «,?;;';"A?9ELmm

1.

THE a1v:a:c:mL– mm{§3?._sa,_
mm Ea%a.}AJv«A&;3»IAI€Z GEEEEAI. }N$¥.3i?.A1*¥CtE co Lm
$6.135; :9-LA, cméns
1w.1,.,*:-gs,” ‘£é’.,E3I§i’3KC’f mm
” * .. 5seeve52;~§« «

2. R A’ ‘
$9.; {}I.;_
AGEIEA HGT
R;g;*._m£am%Y
‘ V VBEE¥fi$1+§9’9ARA2iA&&R EABAHIRA.

Itegmgagmm TALUK

– =~gjB*1*isR1′; 2:35 Lmrmmz my: R1 mm

% — RE3?G1%’EENT5

mgmfifi 3:: E2 is msyzmsfi mm

&’

MFZA. No.9o75/2o%[0}é %{M’v) j L

mm mm tags 17311} or: xv Am’ Acuamr THE
avmzmra’ A,§¥E¥ Avigmn m’rE3:;»: 1é.a.2osas mssm) 3»: mm 30.
223-mac? {)3 mg mg as THE 1:: ADIZJL. Jtzmz, ¢0UR’-I’;_C3F
8HALL <:'At38E$, wmaa, mm-7, EE'I'I?.<Z3PfiLI.T.£i9s§.
Bmmmag, (S»~'3Gfi.I<¥O.7) mmjzy ALLGWZfli'G mg ,CL«§sI1£E.

P'E'1"1'I'IQI«T mg CO§fi~'E§'3ATEQN my smmza E .:i;qc§3g§Er:?_

QF C€3L!FE1§%TIQE'.

THB mm; came on FOR £;iémsa_1<§1z.;« ?£f:~i3:3 V£:;tsY;~'.

THE C0332'? I3ELIV§E.EE 2% FGLIJO¥§'§§§3:- ..

aunggggr" M
'Ibis Qpeal is by the.' fizzf of
compsmatiua awarrckd by theua —

2. Heard, the eonscnt

cf the lemnuefzi’ i«$ai””t?.:£-.%§13ar&s, n is tahan up

3. far ‘V::VfA’A:.”;ts:1fi;?;=:n§ex1ae, we parties we referred
meam§¢:mmwawmgmmgwmnmmeme

4%; efthe emu;-2:

when the claimant vim waaeflmg m 5.

on mamsrcycla havering zwsaafion Hie. KA-G2-EFE

the 23?: side 9:? mad an Itli-L-4 near Elayanada mm},

fl’

3

He}.m&ala, m azzmzinkshsw beming mgstrafian 1\I¢::.KA~52-
3.04′? sagas fin a rah anti rzefint mazmar and éashed gains:

rim motorcycig. 1% a, restnt, he £53 éown and sustaimd.

name, be mad. 3. ciaim pefifinn “before me aaAm,_,-Z ”

seaeldng mmpenamm sf 1¢:a.a,m,eoae1-._ ” v

him a mmmnmm cf &.s1,eo9,v- wimmmgaaé at

5. As there im an at’ ‘V

anddnnt, nglignoe and mi’ fiéfinding
szahicifi, the ant}; mm; that raikgnyfinzgaiégmaon in me
awwmt Q _ 1%
by the
$65 33%: £331 far
mmmem»%»f:; A

5. Aftefr mama! appearing far the

u:;§ju&men: mci award cf the Tribuzxal, 1

am. ‘£2:-‘f -51¢ aammaafien azwméeé by th: ‘I’.ribuna1

mt just; 3s:’s;L%na}:.’a}e, iiim an the lam: aifie ma} hmce ii ‘a

‘ ta &hmmé.

per wound eerfificasks my-.4, Eh: claimem. hm

_ the gaming ingaztmz.

%”

a} Lacaerated wmmd csmr left: mm and baa
2″x1″‘:s:’1[ 2″

b] Crmtzzséczz mm’ kefi; pmabtal Ififififl

C} (kmminubed fiactum of digs} and of lefi ra.fii1:i’;$.”=.

The injuries sustained by 1:112 cifimmt are

cfmchazfi summary 33.?-6, was aheet my-1:3, >

and supjpartnd hy am} eviémce nf tbs

were exmizzwd as ?’W’a-1 md 2 wag *’

inpatéent far a geriod. csf 2 days. i11″V§3§§;ex3:;;*aaéLd. flame,
Ramtazgala. Pm-2, 2:115 has
stated am there is: xwam the
whom may. PW~2 m”«a1;,gn;r ‘h2§§.”;at«é:t%{i:–“th,§§ViAthe cxmms has
austainefi am. of left radius md
cut Iaaeratmiv Sealgg hesmatenza, On
meant and tmécrnam and
dam-mfmy ag:~ar}%:e&%’w};-tmt,k of £31’: mm 3.211% wt hand, there

aizefsgvz-’59:

3* the nzatxzrsa of infiuzias, m.3a,em;-

towards ‘pain ma aufiaxfiag’ ‘m just met

.1 is no wage fir enhanmmmt unfier tlim head.

&’

9. mnsidariw the namm cf ‘min;-223% Md. duration of

neamnnt, Ra.2&,{§6fl;’- awaréad by the Tzfiunai

‘medicai and imfidsntal mama’ is on 1:13: zmer u

dweweci m be enhmd by another Rs.5,0f3fl{~

R&.25.,GG€};’- aznéer flzia head.

1:3. The claimant claims mm» W

fm Rational bed? builécrs and agm Asa’ per
month and Ex). suyport nf “‘;ga_~odueed wpy of
the ELL. at E:-:.P3;1. In inwme, tha
Tribune}. has ms.4,o&o;- per
mrznth ané; as 4 months has
rifitigr ‘has of ‘meeme
dating laié ne saupa far ¢nhmmme21t

zmfier thfg

the nature at’ injurima sustained by the

‘tifm stated by the $23132’ ma gm motmt of

anéégxfiihagpimass the claimazat has to undezw in his

the ‘£’riI:::J.:::13E hm rightgr awarded a sum nf

tswawfi ma csf ameniules’.

$

6

12. ‘me claimant is drivar by prufessim, Afher

suntainm Cammxmmafi fracazre w’ dfial enfi of Eefi radirgilmjnxz

doubt than same wauid sang ‘m.® % to Kg

but it may mt afiect hia fume eaxxmg. PW-2,

mama the ciaimant has atamé amt ai%g$.:bi3it3;V:_éSf_f¥G7§-€«’&ni”.

rm limb and 2.4% tn» the who}: may. ‘§LEa£’:::a’31%${“-..

Pmpfir md :19 awm-d a mm d’ cf V’

mm incsme: am ci7mab:3ity’¥’&n_ v§it.Vi1é”9’ci?t§f§é£¢g£.

15. ‘rims, szmkrsxm * m1*;., :’m *afi;t;i:§édvé:fEér”.the fc11ew2ng’

oempema§Qn:«

9; Pain and $f:.:i”f’¢:::f;Z;ng~ ~ ~ $30,000
1:] . &.25,00=(‘.|
6} mwiafiammi — I

Zagiri :1? 1:-=a*z~im:i4%%# ~ 1%aJ.6,0€%(‘.3
:1) Less sf..sm?.2a1:;.1t1’:*.i2.vs”«»” _ « . m,1s,mac:

e) Lew affiiture inmme dmabfity — $50,009

. . . _ a w _ . — — — _ . . . ‘ . _–.

the ewyeai is aikxwed Em part. The

vV”‘j§;¢1gm¢ent pswsad by we ‘ifribunal is macfified is the

.j:§tai:gfi fimim abwa. me szaimmz rm entitled. an: a. ma:

A”‘V- ‘_ec_;£$e£fa§«§§Vti£§n sf %.1,36,G0fi/- as agmst R3.81,£J09/- awmfiéed

‘I’r:%3.1nai with mum: a 5% pa. an the enhanced

£53

compematinn {sf &.55,,$G=0f-» fiom 1:13:13 6323 af slajm. petitizsn ‘BB

the éate 3fma&au’;::n.

enhazzeeé awmpensatien ammzm with 5mmrwt.__,i§§i$?1fzi§1[:’

mentfi frm -am ciam aframipt 9:? 3 wpygerf ” _

15. ms: iii” the
with pzvmriiaonate Emterest “‘nge_ fixed
clepasit in thus: flama of Ifiatinnalised
Bankgsmeaum vi’ 3 yams.

Rnmfiamimg azmemfzt’ is orizmd 15:: ha

rehaaed in 1m’ 1 m.Agé:f:92h’:1y after the mpesit.
1’7′. Ho’ ‘cgéger ” ” =

sdfl

Judg