High Court Kerala High Court

Mohammed Ali vs District Collector on 21 December, 2009

Kerala High Court
Mohammed Ali vs District Collector on 21 December, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 37018 of 2009(V)


1. MOHAMMED ALI,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
                       ...       Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.M.HABEEB

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN

 Dated :21/12/2009

 O R D E R
                        P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.
                -------------------------------------
                W.P.(C) No. 37018 OF 2009 - V
                -------------------------------------
          Dated this the 21stday of December, 2009

                          J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is the registered owner of a goods vehicle

bearing registration No.KL/07G-6231. The said vehicle was

seized by the second respondent on 10.12.2009 on the allegation

that it was used to transport river sand without a valid pass. A

report was thereafter submitted to the District Collector,

Malappuram. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction

to the respondents to release the vehicle to him by way of

interim custody.

2. A learned single Judge of this Court has in Subramanian

v. State of Kerala (2009 (1) KLT 77) while upholding the

constitutional validity of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and

Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001, held that the District

Collector has the power to direct release of any vehicle which

is seized and produced before him, by way of interim custody. In

such circumstances, I dispose of this writ petition with the

following directions:

(i) The District Collector, Malappuram, shall, within 7 days

from the date on which the petitioner produces a certified copy of

W.P. ) No.37018/2009 2

this judgment before him, issue orders granting interim custody

of the vehicle to the petitioner on such terms and conditions as

he may deem fit to impose. If the vehicle is already involved in

the commission of a similar offence or offences, it will be open to

the District Collector to decline to release the vehicle by way of

interim custody. If likewise, after interim custody is given, the

vehicle is involved in a similar offence, it will be open to the

District Collector to order immediate seizure of the vehicle

notwithstanding the fact that interim custody is given pursuant to

this order.

(ii) The District Collector, Malappuram, shall pass final

orders in the proceedings initiated by him within one month from

the date on which the petitioner produces a certified copy of this

judgment, after notice to and affording the petitioner, a

reasonable opportunity of being heard. The District Collector shall

after final orders are passed, communicate a copy thereof to the

petitioner expeditiously. The contentions of the petitioner on the

merits are kept open.

P.N.RAVINDRAN
Judge

vaa