IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C) No. 31386 of 2007(J)
1. MOHAMMED HANEEFA,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH,
... Respondent
2. THE TANUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
For Petitioner :SRI.K.P.SUDHEER
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
Dated :23/10/2007
O R D E R
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J.
..........................................................
W.P.(C)No.31386 OF 2007
...........................................................
DATED THIS THE 23RD OCTOBER, 2007
J U D G M E N T
The grievance of the petitioner is that the 2nd respondent-
Panchayat has singled out him for coercive action on the reason that
puramboke land has been encroached upon and that no action is being
taken against 17 others, though the Panchayat initiated proceedings
against them also.
2. I do not propose to examine the merits of the matter. Ext.P3
representation has been submitted by the petitioner before the 1st
respondent voicing his grievances. The 1st respondent will take up
Ext.P3 immediately, issue notice to the 17 persons who will be affected
if positive action is taken pursuant to Ext.P3, hear the petitioner and a
representative of those 17 persons and also the Panchayat and take a
correct decision at the earliest and at any rate within six weeks of
receiving copy of this judgment.
The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
(PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE)
tgl
WP(C)N0.
-2-
WP(C)N0.
-3-