High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Mohan Prasad &Amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 4 November, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Mohan Prasad &Amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 4 November, 2010
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                           CWJC No.11611 of 2009
                            MOHAN PRASAD & ORS
                                   Versus
                          THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
                                -----------

3. 04/11/2010 By Resolution issued from the Health

Department dated 29.3.1998, School of

Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy,

functioning in the premises of Patna Medical

College, was upgraded and made an independent

College of Physiotherapy and Occupational

Therapy. The Resolution made it clear that

the College will be an independent Unit and

not a part of Patna Medical College and the

senior most Physiotherapist and Occupational

Therapist working in the respective

Departments of Patna Medical College were

made Drawing and Disbursing Authority and

Controlling Officer. The Principal of Patna

Medical College was also made overall

Controlling Officer of the College. It was

also stipulated in the Resolution that

appointment on teaching posts in the College

would be made as per the procedure for

appointment on teaching post in Medical

Colleges.

Petitioners were working as teachers in
2

the School before its upgradation and, with

its upgradation into College and its

affiliation, petitioners continued to impart

teaching in the College also. Now,

petitioners claim that they should be

regularized as regular teachers in the

College. They also claim that since the

teachers of this College have been equated

with the teachers of Medical Colleges, they

are also entitled for enhancement of their

age of retirement from 60 years to 62 years

which has been done in respect of the

teachers of Medical Colleges.

In respect of petitioner no.1, it is

submitted that he was functioning in the

College on deputation. Therefore, service

conditions of his parent department and as

applicable to his substantive post shall

govern his services. In that view of the

matter, petitioner no.1 ought to have been

allowed to continue in service upto

completion of 62 years of age. However,

treating him as a teacher of the College, he

has been made to superannuate on completion

of 60 years of age. Thus, it is submitted

that the respondents are blowing hot and cold
3

in respect of the petitioners, inasmuch as on

the one hand, they are treating the

petitioners as regular teachers of the

College, whereas on the other, they have not

regularized the services of the petitioners

as regular teachers of the College.

Counter affidavit filed in this case

sworn by one Deputy Secretary of the Health

Department is deficient in pleadings in this

respect.

Therefore, this Court directs the

Principal Secretary of the Health Department

to file an exhaustive affidavit in this case

dealing with the issues raised by the

petitioners in this writ application, noticed

as above in brief.

Learned counsel for the State prays for

four weeks time for the purpose.

Put up after four weeks within first ten

cases.

Pradeep/                            ( J. N. Singh,J.)