Loading...

Mohanan Alias M.T.Mohan Das vs District Collector on 20 October, 2008

Kerala High Court
Mohanan Alias M.T.Mohan Das vs District Collector on 20 October, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 27809 of 2008(I)


1. MOHANAN ALIAS M.T.MOHAN DAS,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. MANOHARAN, S/O.THAJASING,
3. RAJENDRA KUMARI, D/O.THAJASING,
4. RAMESH KUMAR, S/O.GURUDAS SING,
5. SREEKUMAR N.M., S/O.MOHANAN,
6. ANILKUMAR N.M., S/O.MOHANAN,

                        Vs



1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI.
                       ...       Respondent

2. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA),

3. SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY AND LAND

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.I.ABDUL SALAM

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :20/10/2008

 O R D E R
                         V.GIRI,J.

            ----------------------------------------
             W.P ( C) No.27809 of 2008
            ----------------------------------------

           Dated this the 20th October, 2008


                   J U D G M E N T

Petitioners claim to be in possession

of different extents of land in the Chinnakanal

Village and claim assignment of the same under

the provisions of the Land Assignment Act. They

had approached this court earlier in W.P.(C)

No.31903/03, which was disposed of under Ext.P6

judgment. The same is to the following effect.

“The only prayer is for a direction to

the District Collector to consider and

pass orders on the application filed by

the petitioners for assignment of land

vide Ext.P5. The W.P. is disposed of

directing the District Collector to look

into the representation, conduct enquiry

and consider the same based on the

provisions of the Land Acquisition Act,

Rules and the norms issued by the

Government in this regard. A decision

will be taken within a period of four

months from the date of production of a

copy of this judgment by the petitioner

after hearing the petitioners and after

collecting evidence.”

W.P.(C).NO.27809/08

:: 2 ::

2. The petitioners have a grievance

that the direction issued in Ext.P6 has not been

complied with. The remedy lies elsewhere.

Subject to the above observation, the

writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

(V.GIRI)
JUDGE
sk/-

//true copy//

P.S. To Judge

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More Information