High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Mohinder Kaur & Anr vs Ishwar Chander Sharma & Anr on 10 December, 2008

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Mohinder Kaur & Anr vs Ishwar Chander Sharma & Anr on 10 December, 2008
FAO No. 1761 of 1993                                          1

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

                                         FAO No. 1761 of 1993
                                         Date of Decision:10.12.2008

Mohinder Kaur & anr.

                                                   ....appellants

                    Versus

Ishwar Chander Sharma & anr.

                                                   .....respondents

CORAM:         HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG

Present:       Mr.Sachin Sharma,Advocate
               for the appellants

                    ****

RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.

This is claimants’ appeal for enhancement of compensation

as awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Patiala, vide impugned

judgment whereby claimants have been held entitled to a sum of

Rs.96,000/- as compensation along with 12% interest per annum from the

date of petition till its realization on account of death of Piara Singh who is

alleged to have died due to rash and negligent driving of car No.DIB-8271,

driven by respondent No.1.

The Tribunal on appreciation of evidence, assessed the

monthly income of the deceased at Rs.1200/- and after applying a cut of

1/3 for the expenses which the deceased was supposed to be spending on

himself, the annual dependency of the claimants was determined at

Rs.9600/- per annum. At the time of accident, the age of the deceased was

45 years. The Tribunal applied a multiplier of 10 and awarded a sum of

Rs.96,000/- as compensation. Learned counsel for the appellants has

argued that the multiplier of 10 applied in this case is on the lower side as

the deceased Piara Singh was of 45 years of age, as per the claim petition.
FAO No. 1761 of 1993 2

I have heard learned counsel for the appellants and perused

the record. There is no evidence produced by the claimants to prove that

Piara Singh, deceased was 45 years of age at the time of his death,

whereas in the Post-Mortem Report his age has been mentioned as 50

years.

In view of these facts, I find that there is no error in the

application of multiplier by the Tribunal.

No merits.

Dismissed.

(RAKESH KUMAR GARG)
JUDGE
10.12.2008
neenu