Most.Kapur Devi vs The Commissioner-Cum-Chief Exe on 20 September, 2010

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CWJC No.15728 of 2010
             MOST. KAPUR DEVI WIFE OF LATE KARU CHAUDHARY, RESIDENT OF
             MOHALLA MANPUR KUMHAR TOLI, P.S. MUFASIL, DISTRICT- GAYA
                                Versus
             1. THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, MUNICIPAL
                CORPORATION, GAYA
             2. THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER, GAYA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, GAYA
                             -----------

2 20.09.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the

respondent-Corporation.

The grievance of the petitioner is that her husband

who was working on the post of Ward Inspector retired on

31st July, 2007 and later died on 11th of June, 2010. It is

submitted that in the life time of her husband a sum of Rs.

1,64,056/- was paid to the husband of the petitioner

without mentioning any details thereof. It is further

submitted that after the death of her husband family

pension has not been settled as yet with the result the

petitioner-widow is facing serious financial crisis.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-

Corporation submits that the claims of the petitioner shall

be considered without delay as per law.

In the above circumstances, learned counsel for

the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the

pending claims as highlighted in this writ application,

petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the

respondent no.1.

In view of the above, in case such representation

stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner
within a period of four weeks from today along with the

certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the

relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the

grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation

shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously

preferably within a period of four months on receipt of

such representation so that the unpaid claims, if any,

including the family pension may be settled without delay

and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable

may also be paid to the petitioner along with interest

permissible under the rules.

The writ application stands disposed of with the

above observations/directions.

Manish/-                          ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)