Posted On by &filed under High Court, Patna High Court - Orders.


Patna High Court – Orders
Moti Lal Sh vs State Of Bihar on 15 June, 2010
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Cr.Misc. No.20213 of 2010
                   MOTI LAL SAH, SON OF LATE BISHWANATH SAH
                                           Versus
                                    STATE OF BIHAR
                                         -----------

2. 15.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case

instituted for the offence under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468,

34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of Bihar

Lottery Act.

Considering the nature of allegations, in the event

of surrender of the petitioner, named above, within four

weeks from today in connection with Town P.S. Case No.

579 of 2009, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two

sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as

laid down under section 438(2) Cr. P.C., and (i)That one of

the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will

give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related

with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish

information to the court about any change in the address of

the petitioner, (ii) (iii) That the bailor shall also state on

affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature

after his release in the present case and thereafter the court
2

below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for

cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii)That the

petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the

police papers on the given date and be present on date

fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates

and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled for reasons of misuse, and(iv)That the petitioner

will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so

on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to the

cancelled.

( Anjana Prakash, J. )
S.Ali


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

8 queries in 0.145 seconds.