High Court Karnataka High Court

Mr Abdul Zakriya vs The State Of Karnataka on 15 December, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Mr Abdul Zakriya vs The State Of Karnataka on 15 December, 2009
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh
: mwmm Mr' nmmwfiémmm mmw agumgz  KARNAEAKA MM?" CJQURT OF KARNA?fi.K& Hlfifi C€?UR'¥' Q? KAfiN&'W«KA i-HGH CQURT 05*" ¥€&RNfl"€'fiK& HiG§-E COW!

:3 THE HIGH sonar 0? KAaNnmAKA A:_aANGALe§g <:~

DATED THIS THE 15" DAY or nEcEfiBERQ'29¢9 ' Eu'* 

BE FQRE

THE HGN'ELE HR.JUSTICE anL§§gp:»§ aéggsfi  

ca:xzNnL 9ETIT:0x7Ns}ex6§f2cé9,

EETWEEN: -1' g""~ 

1.

MR. ABDUL ZAKR$¥A§ q*v7 ‘W
5/0. ISHAIL, : ” “‘=

AGED 34 rgfifigf uW;,_V _~_=~._V g
R/A. G0LTHEfiAJAL§ HS$SE_& ?0STgW
BAEWEL TALUX,;B.K{u*_ _”»’~V”

2.53:. RAFIQ ‘,%%V A

319. L&TEVAnbULLa;V_E

A339 3? 2? 2, ‘a_ V
axa Gunxyafifimz Hausa” “”” ”

TI??U man, EETEAL TQ. 3.x.

3;fi3fiEL”Q&

j* 5!eJg§E Aafigfima

Raga AHfifiT 29 $3333

gTr=RfiA.2ALLAgan;Iam3sE
‘$£HflE$%E%F§fl’HEUSE & yaw,

V’ =5£*r:a*§;L”.–rALsK, 9.2:.

‘ “4gséI.:Rsan
“SfQ.§€EfiEfl¥§3

*uhGED 21 Ymaas,

R33 I HGUSE
GQL IQUSE 5: POST;

BATWAL TAXIEJK; D.K. . . .- PETITIGHER3

{By M3’S.ME}”i:’I’HI CK-{$33, ADV.)
§<V

Wm WWW w~ mmmmm :-mm WW1 my KARNATAKA HIGH mm? as mmmmm mm cmm" W mmm";;'"'""""

£638 CQLE

':MInU'V¢ 6: U

VIPC.

STATE 03 KARNATAKA

BX BANTWAL TOWN

9012153 STATIGN T .. A’a1g’s1′:{;r:€z}Ef:%:fI””‘

(By Sri: 32:52:53 R. _G’yIRIJI—,—- ffA1::v,..;

c:RL.3;= FILE}: ;I,{$..§.é7$_ c:’R,. §~?;.’;f:.’-7′ BY TI-IE
Anvccawz ma .,?s’:r.fI*Ijit:¥f;~IEr?;””~f.ff’~?%3..Fi»?¥'<§; mar mm
HON"BI.E cofiraztv TBii§_–..__ Pl_.EZ§S}§2j.? fro EHLARGE mm
PETITIONERS EVENT or mix
Aamsr c1*:.§:1gm;AV'731§:u.g;3'3/zccké any BANTWAL Tow
POLICE %$*.:'A:'3:c3r;; 'rm oyrszsrca P/{ifs
279, 333, "5:3gz,V% ié'2%;i",'A%#%1:3:f'2', 39': Km SEC. 149 03*

: i'§1I£§.. _"P;E:'.1':i'.§'.'I9!~I CGHING {:2}: ma masks mxs
mm. mm FGLLOWIKG:

GREER

petitinneza have Enough: fa: grant: cf

“-airificiiaatary haii in cannaatien with crime

‘$9.133/2999 of Bantwal Tm-in Iéwiice Statian,

B.K. far tbs alleged zxffanczaas puniahabls amder:
W

as

Seatians 219, 333, 594, 324, 1a9,mM3o7 ;ra§§;’*3’

with Section 149 of IPC.

2. Heard the learned 3 ¢oun§§1 ;fo§¥. fi#aV}

petitienexs and the Vléa;ngd§;u@§v§rnment
Plaader. Avv :H”*ffv

3. The allegatianv¢gai$étK§hs §§Eiti§né£$ is
that they asaaulte@ £:¢¢°th§V¢ififixand caused
griavaus injury an thé xnaé’¢f t$§;ifijured.

4. Acacrfiiag ta thé_;éaznea caunael for thy
petitiéngrs, is filed against

same unfinmwm per§anéAafid the petitianers hava

V§§t invul§édgin*theVéunmiaaion of the mffence.

“u$§c§r#®§g§y;¥#Qfi§ht far grant af anticipatery

a smwwm ma” nnmumanisn naura a..uum. «Qt l(A£(NM§AKfli Mifififl EIQURK £3?’ KARNAYAKA §-%M%H CQUR? C)? KARNATAKA Hifii-‘I COURT OF KARNfi3§§’AKA HEGH CQU4

bai;;”;._

5. The laaxnad Gcvernmant §laader submitted

that there ia apamific avert act againat thesa

§ /

§?”

3 WWW W ammmwmammw miwm %.&.&Mi§,3 «yr mutmmmm a-mm mum W ammmam mm-g COURT or KAWMAM mm mum or mmmmm Maw mu

petitioners and rasistad gra.z:_t:,.A,,s:;__f

bail .

6. Having :r:egaa:d;__ .fa;«;:§,:’§ and
czixrcnmatancem mt got a. fit
case far g’£’::’i’ :’; bail.
A<:<:z.”c3.:i,nglyf;.–» i’4Esifé :’i’§é%z’ifi:saed.

Sd/ –

IUDGE