Mr B Hanumantharaju vs The Government Of Karnataka on 2 November, 2010

I

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 2"" DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2010

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE EN. NAGAMOHAN DAS57j<~,S:

WRIT PETITION NO. 29622/2010(GM.RES5:" Y:A7:VV: 

BETWEEN ;   

Mr. EHANUMANTHARAJU
S/O LATE HANUMAIAH

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS

R/A NO.47I,3RD STAGE,   H  - 

1ST BLOCK, WEST OF CEOR1)i*'RO;A_Di.; A V "   A
BASAVESHWARANAGARA, .   "   
BANGALORE~«»560 079.  _ 'g.. P;ETlTIONER

(By sn.H.N;M.PRAs_AD;D  "

AND:

  %' 1'1%E%%'GO\}'ER:mAENT OF KARNATAKA

 _REP_RESEN'}TE'D BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
VI_DIޣANASO_UD'HA
EAN_GALORE__.  560 001.

_.V  ,_CONTROL.LER OF LEGAL METROLOGY

 ,NO.:?.,_ ALIASKAR ROAD,

% "'-BA1_\TGALORE.  RESPONDENTS

V” gay SE.K.S.MALL1KARJUNA1AH,HCGP)

.,
7:,_,..,

TIIIS WRIT PETITION Is FILED UNDER ARTI(.3ML’5iS”.,
AND 227 OP THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1_;W1TIIV:-A._A .
PRAYER To DIRECT THE RI TO CONSIDER THE ‘LE’PiTERE»

DT.O3.08.2005 AT ANNEXURE-B AND ETC.

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING
PRELIMINARY HEARING .. ‘B’ GROUPWTI-IIS DMZ, =TIIE~, ‘

COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWIN(‘};..__u

Petitioner was workinzgfiiisp ihpss;i:.st:.ant’~fiiontrolier of Legal
Metrology from 1993 to petitioner
was in service, fmisappiropriated a sum of
Rs.J,70,048/v–‘_.__In was lodged against
the petitioner OI Chikmagaiur police and the

same came to be Iregistefediiiin ciriiirge No. 91/ 1999. After investigation

a Chargeyfshieet is fiietdoni CAC. No. 2560/2004 and the same is

A pendirrg, adjudicati Orr.

Ine’anwhile the Legal Metrology department

Vrecovereti’ the misappropriated amount from the retiral benefits

‘:,4.¢p;n;yIabie.rEto the petitioner. In this connection the petitioner gave a

Fjww

representation on 08.05.2005 to withdraw the criminal case against

him. Reacting to the request of the petitioner second respondent —

Legal Metroiogy department addressed a communication to thefirst

respondent -»» State Government as per Annexure

03.08.2005. Since no orders are passed by the ii

Government, petitioner is before this Court; fora. writi’of’manda1nus. , .2

3. No prejudice will be caused:°*to the”fi_r_st’~ respondent –
Government if they are directed toiiiicoii-sideiri’-the redtiesti of the

Petitioner dated 08.05.2005. 2 V

4. Avcco’rdingly,’lih.eliwrit=..pie’ti_tion is hereby disposed off. A

direction is isstiedto the_firs_tire.s-pendent ~ Government to consider

-the repreisentattion of “the.p_etirioner dated 08.05.2005 in accordance

i”witli;Vla’;v, in_V’ti~;e'<l.i:ght_ of the recommendation dated 30.07.2005 as

V expeditiiotisly Ordered accordingly.

tins/031 120:0.

Salli
Hide?