Central Information Commission Judgements

Mr. Bhuwan Chandra vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 13 February, 2009

Central Information Commission
Mr. Bhuwan Chandra vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 13 February, 2009
                    CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                           Room No. 415, 4th Floor,
                         Block IV, Old JNU Campus,
                             New Delhi - 110067
                            Tel: +91 11 26161796

                                                    Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2008/00381/1645
                                                          Appeal No. CIC/ SG/A/2008/00381
Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal:

Appellant                           :      Mr. Bhuwan Chandra,
                                           H. No. 81, Pocket 20,
                                           Sector - 24, Rohini,
                                           Delhi - 110085.

Respondent                          :      Mr. Devender Kumar PIO,

Chief Engineer DEMS (PIO),
Municipal Corporation of Delhi,
Town Hall, Chandni Chowk,
Delhi – 110006.

RTI application filed on            :      07/10/2008
PIO's Reply                         :      27/11/2008
First Appeal filed on               :      08/11/2008
First Appellate Authority order     :      Not mentioned.
Second Appeal filed on              :      24/12/2008

The Appellant had filed an application related to The Transparent and Corruption-Free
Functioning, Main Objective of the RTI Act.
In pursuance of the office order of dated 15-02-1994, twenty three (23) Assistant Sanitary
Inspector were promoted on the post of Sanitary Inspectors. Uniquely, four (4) ASIs from
General Cadre and nineteen (19) ASis from Schedule Caste cadre were promoted effecting from
29-07-93, with immediate effect and on Ad-hoc basis respectively.
The information sought with the PIO’s reply as under:

S.No. Information Sought PIO’s Reply

1. Provide me the authenticated copies of Copy of Seniority List of Assistant Sanitary
the “Seniority list of the Assistant Inspector is attached herewith. Promotions of
Sanitary Inspector”; where from all 23 persons have been done on the basis of the
the above 23 persons were promoted recommendations of the Department
on the post Sanitary Inspector and Promotion Committee.
describe the Logic of the back date of
29-07-1993.

2. Provide me the authenticated copies of A copy of Minutes/Notings of the meeting of
the Minutes and Noting of the the Department Promotion Committee held on
Meeting of the Departmental 24-12-1993 is attached herewith.
Promotion Committee held on 24-12-

1993.

3. Provide me the Names of the members The names of Members of DPC are given in
of the DPC, Names of OI-II and staff the Minutes.
of CSE and describe the frequency of
convening the meeting of the DPC.

4. Provide me the authenticated copies of Not available.

the Post-based Reservation Roaster for
promoting the Scheduled Caste
Reserved Category.

5. Provide me the authenticated copies of Copies of the Recruitment Rules of SI s, CSI,
the Rules/RR of eligibility criteria, SS & AHO (NT) are attached herewith.
specified for the promotions on the
posts of SI, SS and AHO (NT).

First Appellate Authority Ordered:

Not mentioned.

Relevant facts emerging during hearing:
The following were present.

Appellant: Mr. Bhuwan Chandra
Respondent: Mr. A.K. Saxena on behalf of Mr. Devendra Kumar PIO DEMS
The respondent has given the “Seniority list of the Assistant Sanitary Inspector” as asked at
query 1 and the appellant contends this is fake. The appellant has another list of 2005 where
some of the data is reported differently. The appellant is not able to give any concrete evidence
of his allegation.

Decision:

The Appeal is disposed.

To allay the appellant’s misgivings the PIO is directed to give an inspection of the relevant file to
the appellant.

This decision is announced in open chamber.
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.

Shailesh Gandhi
Information Commissioner
13th February 2009

(In any case correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)