Central Information Commission
File No.CIC/SM/A/2009/002050
Right to Information Act2005Under Section (19)
Dated: 31 August 2010
Name of the Appellant : Shri Deepchand Verma
108, Manu Ganj,
Dehradun.
Name of the Public Authority : CPIO, Oriental Bank of Commerce,
Regional Office, IInd Floor,
Radha Palace, 78, Rajpur Road,
Dehradun.
The Appellant was not present in spite of notice.
No one was present on behalf of the Respondent.
2. We had fixed the hearing through videoconferencing. In spite of notice,
neither party was present in the Dehradun studio of the NIC. However, we
carefully perused the contents of the second appeal and the other relevant
records. We found that the CPIO had provided detailed information regarding
all the queries of the Appellant. Now, the Appellant wants the relevant RBI
guideline based on which various deductions have been made from or charges
levied in his account. Although he had not asked for any such document in his
original RTI application, it would be proper for the CPIO to provide him with the
relevant circulars/guidelines issued by the RBI or any other authority based on
which the bank decided to levy the charges or make deductions from his
account from time to time. Therefore, we now direct the CPIO to provide to the
Appellant within 10 working days from the receipt of this order, photocopy of the
relevant circular/guideline issued either by the RBI or by any other authority
based on which the said charges had been levied/deductions made as stated
by the Appellant in his RTI application.
3. With the above direction, the appeal is disposed off.
4. Copies of this order be given free of cost to the parties.
CIC/SM/A/2009/002050
(Satyananda Mishra)
Information Commissioner
Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against
application and payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the CPIO of this
Commission.
(Vijay Bhalla)
Assistant Registrar
CIC/SM/A/2009/002050