Central Information Commission Judgements

Mr. Dharamvir Singh vs Mr. Anjum Masood on 8 September, 2010

Central Information Commission
Mr. Dharamvir Singh vs Mr. Anjum Masood on 8 September, 2010
                       CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                           Club Building (Near Post Office)
                         Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067
                                Tel: +91-11-26161796

                                                         Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2010/002049/9285
                                                                Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2010/002049

Relevant Facts

emerging from the Appeal:

Appellant                    :             Mr. Dharamvir Singh
                                           H.No. 56, Village Barwala,
                                           Delhi - 110039.

Respondent                   :             Mr. Anjum Masood

Public Information Officer & Assistant Director
Directorate of Education
Government of NCT of Delhi
Office of Assistant Director of Education
Public Information Office, Room No. 220,
Old Secretariat, Delhi- 110054.


RTI application filed on            :      15/04/2010
PIO replied                         :      12/05/2010
First appeal filed on               :      19/05/2010
First Appellate Authority order     :      02/07/2010
Second Appeal received on           :      16/07/2010

S. No                         Information Sought                                  Reply of the PIO
1.      If any candidate completes his BA Graduation degree and JBT          Yes he will.

Training simultaneously. Will he qualify for the post of TGT after
completing his B.Ed?

2. The details of the preference given for the post of Assistant Photocopy of the rules of the
Teacher by the Delhi Administration to the JBT trained teacher recruitment procedures for
who has three years experience and has completed his JBT the Assistant teacher is
training from any recognized school school. enclosed in the reply.

3. Copy of the order and date on which the order was passed As Above.

regarding the cancellation of the rule by which the above
mentioned preference was given

Grounds for the First Appeal:

Unsatisfactory information provided by the PIO

Order of the First Appellate Authority (FAA):
Order not enclosed.

Grounds for the Second Appeal:

Unsatisfactory information provided by the PIO

Page 1 of 2
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:
The following were present
Appellant: Mr. Dharamvir Singh;

Respondent: Mr. Anjum Masood, Public Information Officer & Assistant Director; Mr. Ramesh Rahi,
Office Superintendent;

The respondent has provided the recruitment rules for query-2 & 3. The appellant feels that
some further clarification should be given which are not on the records.

Decision:

The Appeal is disposed.

This decision is announced in open chamber.
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.
Any information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.

Shailesh Gandhi
Information Commissioner
08 September 2010
(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)(YM)

Page 2 of 2