----=~A-.. yr mmamm mus:-u couxr or xnmnmxp men COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA man com
IN THE nmn count as xmuarnxa AT % f _
Dated this the 25"' day of Febnzar-'$2003
ma uonmm mt. Jusrzcs afizuugn. % A
Mr. mama %
szo. Emc J
men 38 YEARS.' «
PRESEN11,Y'iVa9eT':§§lO.:§iAE:',-
15m CRO<SS. %
cm. MILL RDAD,'
57. moms Town
B.A.NGA§_{_)RE-BC." _ '
& . &V %%%%% vmnmea
(By M}"s. _ ADVs., 3
wanna-u-«ulc-
_ Mrs. SHARHINE BKRADINE BYFGRD
"'v:'§"/0. FABIAN BYFORD
; AGES 35 YEARS
T AND D/0. LESLIE D'MONTE
PRE.'5$NTLY R./AT N033, 15'!' CROSS
VIVEKANANDA HAGAR
BANGALORE - 560033
RESPONDENT
-nun uvvnl vr l\l’|l\l’l”\lI’\I\l’\ I’ll\.7I”‘I LUUKI gr “AKNA’AKA figfifi LQQUKF {JI’ KAKNAIAKA HIGH CUUI
than employer, which application was not consid_u_§red.;VV’_~ _
wife has sworn to a false affidavit mntendin.;§’::V.tlla§ ”
petifioner was earning Rs.1,0Gr,£)(:2:l;)[-:.:gl’a¢;:’
documents praducad by the pataifEanér_v;§’howsVtliaglzilllé
earning only 1500 Dirharm, l§vli’e:._V”vvIg1lu¢V”¢fin the
Indian currency is when it is
demanstratod thug she the
Family Court_Vuafa§§s”:A:’rv§§t the impugned
order! ..
4- Act dealing with Alimony
V pendegm ;6!’el’1l”re#§:ls-$5 &’nd§§:
sat under £115 Ad’, whether it be
V a husband or a mute, and whether
age She has obtained an order an’ pratectlan,
.. , g*.heV”‘a-{rifle may present a petition far exgezrsw of
V’ * fire pmceedinw and aiimonr pending the suit.
Such pefitaim she»? be mrvvad an the
husband; and the Court, on being satafled cf
the truth of the statements therein cantammfi.
may make such arder on file husband’ for
-.- . , …… ……….u u. nnnn:-m-uxn mun LUUKI OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNAYAKA HIGH COU
dependent on her parenm and nave the huE_§3fifi_’j §!Vé$:__’
refused and neglected to maintain her and’.t::»auf:ef¢r§, 4sjha_ ‘
has sought for alimony. Except tfzge ‘
husband and the demand,’ fpr
avormenu are substantially on
verifying the rnaheriai :’c§§; §§;9fica!l;,} field that
both this parties hgve ne;..ad_fi-u<L$é§::5»' f§n'§~v§§§d._ééicn in support
of their respe;&:§*¢aé{.1'=§3¥§inf;5, in
View of an "f'=fa§':'1i|y Courl: procaaded
to swat? %%%§§Rs.2,mo}~ per month
and litigt;ti:?:¥1" In the fight of we
admittgsa ggagtiansfnig rm parties, the fact that the
!i"'r"a'~5._ """ Ms fob, he was not aamirifl
i.ssij.~;:ieged and the wife is now earning a
i fabdisfifis §a~%z§iI5,§V hoids no water. Therefore, I do next find
% jfgny maittfi-; this pets;-inn.
. sfiéccordingiy, the Writ Petition is dismissed.
film’! 3