Central Information Commission Judgements

Mr.Fakira Prasad vs Canara Bank on 24 August, 2011

Central Information Commission
Mr.Fakira Prasad vs Canara Bank on 24 August, 2011
                                    ds U nz h ; l wp uk vk;ks x
                                   Central Information Commission
                                   2 ry] foxa 'c' / 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing
                               vxLr ØkfUr Hkou / August Kranti Bhavan
                                  Hkhdkth dkek Iysl/ Bhikaji Cama Place
                              ubZ fnYyh ­ 110066 / New Delhi - 110066
                                                 Phone No.011­26183996
                                                     *****


                                                                         No.CIC/SM/C/2011/000914
                                                                                                         
                                                                                Dated: 24 August 2011


 Name of the Complainant                     :      Shri Fakira Prasad
                                                    Sr. Leader of Janta Dal United,
                                                    Mohalla Gyan nagar, Rajopatti,
                                                    Distt - Sitamarhi - 843 301.


 Name of the Public Authority                :      The Appellate Authority 
                                                    Canara Bank, 
                                                    Circle Office, 4th floor, 
                                                    Luv­Kush Towers, Exhibition Road
                                                    Patna 01.



                                                 ORDER

Shri   Fakira   Prasad   of   Sitamarhi   has   complained   to   the   Central 

Information Commission that he received no reply/information from the Central 

Public   Information   Officer   although   he   had   filed   his   RTI­application   on   17 

January  2011.     A   copy   each   of   the   RTI­application   and   the   complaint   are 

enclosed for ready reference. 

2. It is noted that the Complainant did not have an opportunity to go to the 

Appellate   Authority   and   has   directly   approached   the   Commission   with   his 

complaint.   In exercise of powers vested under Section 18(1) of the Right to 
Information   (RTI)   Act,   we   direct   the   Appellate   Authority   to   enquire   into   the 

allegations made by the Complainant and after giving him an opportunity of 

hearing, to pass an appropriate order with a view to ensuring that the desired 

information is provided to the Complainant without any further loss of time. If, 

however, the CPIO/Appellate Authority had responded in time and provided the 

desired information, please let us know at the earliest.

3. We also direct the Appellate Authority to obtain the explanation of the 

CPIO in writing for not providing the information in time and to forward the same 

to us along with his comments before 26 September 2011.  We will decide on 

the imposition of penalty on the CPIO in terms of Section 20(1) of the Right to 

Information (RTI) Act thereafter.    

4. In case the Complainant is not satisfied with the orders of the Appellate 

Authority, he is free to approach this Commission again in second appeal.

5. The Commission ordered accordingly.

(Satyananda Mishra)
Chief Information Commissioner

Authenticated true copy.  Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against 
application and payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the CPIO of this 
Commission.

(Vijay Bhalla)
Deputy Registrar
Copy to:

The General Manager of the Canara Bank, Patna is directed to forward a copy of 
this order to the designated Appellate Authority for implementing our directions.