Mr H N Gopala Gowda @ Krishne Gowda vs Mr A M Prasanna on 15 July, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Mr H N Gopala Gowda @ Krishne Gowda vs Mr A M Prasanna on 15 July, 2009
Author: Subhash B.Adi
nu THE HIGH cou RT 0? KARNATAKA AT aANe':¢c:é;§AEAA  " 

DATED ms '¥'HE15"" mv OF JULY,..2§A}At32$   A T A  

mamas 

"me HON'BLE MR. JU$T|CEAS3~1JE'H;A'\SH $.".A'#.Div = A  

 

CRL.P.No.2"§f?!206f     A
saws N _ A %  %  
1 MR H N GOPALA GowaAAA@%J_m3;AA$r9E 
AGEE)51YEARS,._     
S/OMANJEGO.WDaA,_  A   
am sr--_'Lwa aasmscmu,  j   
BANKAL HQBL§A;_«Mi3.Bi{3ER_E__TALUAK=_'  A
ca:KMAeAL:,m:a:$TRicT,  fl  

2 MR aAMANNA@_aAMU%%%  '  
ADfiLT% L 'La =4*.A
S/OSAIWEGQWDAA L 
ms!" ESAGO,9{J'2j 8A1*~1K;§«LHI3BLi
MUDJGERE Tm CH!KMAGALU¥~'{ ms?

3  w=m B iPRA$HANTi-!;AADULT
 »SfO,1AYA'Dt'LVA??A
' FEATAH.A,hEKEREA,j.$0NiBEEDU HOBLJ
aasaae ERE:'_~TALUK§
CH.l.KMAGALEgR DIST!-"%iCT.

  ,4. A' MR RATA?§r\N, ADULT

  '--  SIGHCHANDFEEGQWDA,

 % :?:'AT';KUNDOOR,
 A'¥%lii}'£';A¥€5ERE TALUK

" CFHKMAGALUR msTR:cT.

A A " A AMR MANJAIAH, AQULT

SIC} PADMAIAH
WAT ESAGODU,
BANKAL HOBLI



MUBIGERE TQ,
CHICKMAGALUR DIST.

(By Sr: : R B DESHPANDE & P P HEGDE, AW)  ' 2 

AN9 :

uuuu tn

1 MRAM PHASAMA
AGED 44 YEARS   *  
SlOA.G,MANJUNATHA aowD,s.   AA 
RAT HEECHAHALLIESTATE    
HALEKERE VlLi..A{:':E§ GOWQHALL! P_o$T,  ~  
MUDIGERE TALt.¥~%§, {SHlK§MAG}§LU.£{*E3_§$}'RIE3'f

2 THE STATE IHROUGH THE._PO¥_'%GE. 
sue-zukspeofea'c3c:r;~::aE$1>:.I  
POLICE--S'!'ATiON'--' 3 '   ~ %
REPT9. BY THE STATE. ?U._3L:!f;";'
PROSECUTQH _ g  
H:GH,r.:ou RTQ? KARNATAKA,

 BANQALGRE ~

 %  M   RESPONDENTS
(By  :% '_HONf§£§_!?Pfi..,__H_§3GP FOR R2)

cRL.,%= i"iL~!-L"-.::"i3:'..--U}'S. 432 amac BY THE ADVQCATE ma ma

<LT_PE"'rmoNE'r~z PBAYING THAT Tl-£iS HON'BLE COURT MAY as

~ ~ M PLEASED TG amen THE IMPUGNED QRDER 07572207 masses av

. THE'--,Ai2)i"3.l,..C.J,(JR.9¥é.) MUDEGERE we came NO.98f2GO4 or-'
 V--.;Gf3¥sfiBEE $i;'g'* as {SUBSEQUERTLY aeezsraasa AS
*»j%.,_€;.¢::;m..97:2ee?). REJECTQKIG THE 3* FENAL aspom" main av me
k?==<::L:cET% AND Reeasrsmm cmmirw. ones AGAINST THE

A(.3.C'USEDf?ET£T§0NERS HEREIN AND ISSUWG SUMMGNS TO YHE

 vA.a.<;*;:usED, AND ouasa ALL Fumn ER Pnocssmwes.

Viéoliowéng;

This petition coming on fat admisséon this day, the court made the

 PETITlQI§ ER_$1.'MT.j:~  % T' 1 V



ORDER

Petitioners have sought for quashing of the ozrder

passed by the Addiflivii Judm (Jr.Dn). Mudifjgéfeén (f$ri4;¥ze_:Vi’$}:€V);9{3!V2t3§:§és1 5:, V’

Gonibeedu Police station.

2. Respondent haé flied a police’ cgmpiatnt ‘f:ef;>re’.’vt§Ia>,A:

pofice station. Mudigere taiuk, ChEkmagafiir._i)istfict ‘vkasifegistered
in Crime No.98f2004 on 5.103% :.;;r jgifififice’ puniéhéble under
Section 143, 147; 148; 504. 42?, 5q_6[T’::;.s:

3. 8 report. In pursuance of the
same, the Iearnefi””Magis;raté~–._i;=*.su§éd nofice to the compiainant. The
c9h1p;i3ina§§{‘~:fii{g§i§ a.VV_protexét’r::seez*:’o on 2.7.2005 and produced the materiai

aruVd–.ais:: iedTA eyidavr-29%’ sf two witnesses as PW2 and PW3. Learned

:7″gqfiagistrat锑:3oné¥d£#:§_n§’Vihe material produceé and evidence on recorci,
._reje’¢:ted rebért and took cognizance of the offence and 595396

,: -$Vur’§’msr§s; ~- I; isvifhis orde: that is caiied in quesfion by the petitioner.

_’ A;_fi~..aa:ned <:ounse§ fer tha petitione: submits that, the material

by the complainant do not make out any case agains? the

,;,-t

petitiener. He aiso relied on the protest memo and the i.
by the complainant and submitted that the emire.xszatariiiliwéiiibiééivifzéii 'A V'
complainant will not make oar: any case
mechanicaliy rejected the B repart and hVa$'—i§§ueri'srinamgrr}§; VA

5. Learned counsel appearing fo{..!i{é:”Lvco:r:piairr&hiéubliéliited that
after the B regort was reiected, ithé-;~ mfooeeded with the
matter. Now the .”‘a’ruré’é’§ubmit£ed that at .this
stage the the petitioner can raise all
these conteniirirr ai éihei

6. Though flied in 230?, since there was no
irgtérigzg %e_arn?ed”i\flagisvu’ate has proceeded with the matter and

new_V;r;e:V’cemp~!§ir’eah«fé’veyfiencae is recorded anti it is posted for further

‘xxr,_AAevideni:eL..’*At instead of interfering with the proceedings, it

V”7I§aroL:iVé be dispose of the pefition with liberty to the petitioner

4: rgfiiée ihg riontaenfions urged in mis petition before the learned

7. Accordingiy. direction is issued to the teamed

dispase of the matter as eariy as possibie and_,nat._later_fl’iér§ K V’

from the date of receipt of copy of this order. I

DKBI

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *